RegistryCompare › Flyte vs Nocobase

Flyte vs Nocobase

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Nocobase, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Flyte leads on trust — 72.3/100 (Grade B) vs 66.4/100 (Grade B), a 5.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Flyteflyteorg/flyte Nocobasenocobase/nocobase
HVTrust score 72.3 66.4
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #109 #187
Rank in Workflow Platforms #6 #7
GitHub stars 7.2k 23.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10 4.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 98k/wk 47/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.4 8.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.5 12.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 15.9 12.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 4 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Flyte profile Nocobase profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →