Registry › Compare › Flyte vs Nocobase

Flyte vs Nocobase

Both are Grade B and 4.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Flyte leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

B Flyte 72.4

Type-safe, distributed orchestration of agents, ML pipelines, and real-time inference on your k8s — in pure Python with async/await, also other languages (rust, go and ts)

flyteorg/flyte · #323 overall · #7 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Flyte if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.1Adoption: 153.9k weekly downloads against 16
+2.5Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 99%
+1.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.8 against 3.8

B Nocobase 68.1

NocoBase is the open-source platform for building, running, and evolving business systems with AI. Agents write the code and do the work, NocoBase provides the foundation and governance, and people make the decisions.

nocobase/nocobase · #422 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Nocobase doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

12.2

Safety / IntegrityFlyte +2.5

9.7

13.4

TransparencyFlyte +1.7

11.7

16.3

AdoptionFlyte +4.1

12.2

-0.3

Runtime calibrationNocobase +4.0

+3.7

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Nocobase, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Flyteflyteorg/flyte	Nocobasenocobase/nocobase
HVTrust score	72.4	68.1
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#323	#422
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#7	#8
GitHub stars	7.8k	24.9k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.8 / 10	3.8 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	NOASSERTION
Downloads	154k/wk	16/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.2	9.7
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.4	11.7
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	16.3	12.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Declared
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Unknown	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Flyte profile Nocobase profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →