Is Nocobase safe to use?

Nocobase has an HVTrust score of 66.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #187 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Nocobase?

Nocobase scores 66.4/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 23.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Workflow Platforms.

Nocobase

nocobase/nocobase

NocoBase is an open-source AI + no-code platform for building business systems fast. Instead of generating everything fr

Workflow Platforms TypeScript Grade B Listed NOASSERTION

66.4/100

Rank #187 of 1283

Compare Nocobase

How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-15 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank +4

Is Nocobase safe? Nocobase scores 66.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #187 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 62% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms

#5 Flowise — 73.2 (B) → #6 Flyte — 72.3 (B) → #8 Airbyte — 65.8 (B) → #9 Hatchet — 65.4 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#203 → #187)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#186 → #200)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#204 → #186)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with Trigger.dev Get email alerts for Nocobase View Workflow Platforms Report missing data

92.2

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Workflow Platforms

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-15

Activity & Reach

Stars

23.7k

Forks

2.8k

Last Push

2026-08-15

today

Commits (4 wk)

123

Downloads (7d)

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

107

Rank Change

▲16

was #203

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms

66.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Nocobase Workflow Platforms average (24 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

8.5 / 25

1.8 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.9 below avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

in line with avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

20.0 / 20

1.4 above avg 18.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

12.7 / 20

in line with avg 12.6

Activity Inputs

92.2 / 100

StarsRepository reach

26.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

16.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 14, 2026

Signed Commits

62%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 9

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Nocobase safe?

Nocobase has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Nocobase publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Nocobase. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Nocobase have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Nocobase has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Nocobase actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Nocobase use?

Nocobase ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Nocobase's commits signed?

62% of the last 100 commits to Nocobase are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Nocobase head-to-head

Nocobase vs Trigger.dev → Nocobase vs n8n → Nocobase vs Langflow →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

4 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Nocobase's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-16

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-15

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: declared → none

2026-06-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-11

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: declared → none

2026-06-10

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-01

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain Nocobase?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Nocobase from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#203 → #187)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#186 → #200)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#204 → #186)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#186 → #201)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#157 → #183)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#107 → #123)

2026-06-16

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-15

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: declared → none

2026-06-13

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-11

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: declared → none

2026-06-10

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

2026-06-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#103 → #122)

2026-06-10

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 3.0pts (64.7 → 61.7)

2026-06-01

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-06-01

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-06-01

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 97 spots (#192 → #95)

2026-06-01

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 61.8pts (0.0 → 61.8)

2026-06-01

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 92pts (0 → 92)

2026-05-31

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #192

GitHub → npm: nocobase

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/nocobase.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/nocobase)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/nocobase"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/nocobase.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Workflow Platforms

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON