Flyte vs Langflow
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Langflow, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Langflow leads on trust — 76.0/100 (Grade B) vs 67.6/100 (Grade B), a 8.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Flyteflyteorg/flyte | Langflowlangflow-ai/langflow |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 67.6 | 76.0 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #128 | #71 |
| Rank in Workflow Platforms | #6 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 7.2k | 152.8k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.2 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 98k/wk | 21k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.8 | 11.7 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.8 | 13.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.9 | 18.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 5 — OpenAI, Postgres, Qdrant, … |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Warning | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →