Flyte vs Langflow
Langflow leads on trust: 78.9/100 (Grade B) against 72.3/100 (Grade B), a 6.6-point gap. Langflow leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence.
Type-safe, distributed orchestration of agents, ML pipelines, and real-time inference on your k8s — in pure Python with async/await, also other languages (rust, go and ts)
Flyte doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.
Choose Langflow if adoption matters most.
- +1.4Adoption: 156.3k GitHub stars against 7.8k
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flyte and Langflow, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Flyteflyteorg/flyte | Langflowlangflow-ai/langflow |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 72.3 | 78.9 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | B | A |
| Overall rank | #311 | #193 |
| Rank in Workflow Platforms | #7 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 7.8k | 156.3k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.8 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 163k/wk | 8k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.2 | 11.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.4 | 13.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.3 | 17.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 1 — Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →