Upsonic

Build autonomous AI agents in Python.

Agent Frameworks Python Grade D Listed MIT
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
21.9/100 · Grade D
Last push
2026-06-18 · 4d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
21.9/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
12.7/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
2.4/25
What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#254 → #277)
2026-06-20
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #254
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
67.4
Activity Score · out of 100
21.9
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#277
Global Rank · of 300
#64

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-06-22 00:01 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-06-20 2026-06-21

Activity & Reach

Stars
7.9k
Forks
736
Last Push
2026-06-18
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
2?
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
28
Rank Change
=
was #277

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

21.9 / 100 · 50.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
2.4 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
12.7 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
9.4 / 20

Activity Inputs

67.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
6.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
48%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Upsonic safe?

Public trust evidence for Upsonic is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Upsonic publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Upsonic. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Upsonic have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Upsonic. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Upsonic actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does Upsonic use?
Upsonic ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Upsonic's commits signed?
48% of the last 100 commits to Upsonic are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

Profile context only

HVTrust currently ranks supply-chain and project-integrity trust only. This public view shows a compact AI-agent surface snapshot from repo docs and manifests. These fields are descriptive context and do not affect the production HVTrust rank. An experimental local preview remains available in Score Lab →, and the policy boundary is tracked on the roadmap →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
11 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Anthropic
  • E2B
  • Firecrawl
  • OpenAI
  • Pinecone
  • Postgres
  • Qdrant
  • Redis
  • Tavily
  • Weaviate
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • database
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Upsonic?

HVTrust scores Upsonic from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1Rank 1
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#254 → #277)
2026-06-20
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #254

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 21.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/upsonic.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/upsonic)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/upsonic"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/upsonic.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.2 · Raw JSON