AgentLite

Agent Frameworks Jupyter Notebook Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
40.5/100
Rank #621 of 1308
Compare AgentLite

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-06-02 · 84d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is AgentLite safe? AgentLite scores 40.5/100 (Grade D), ranked #621 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.2/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-06-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#602 → #616)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#570 → #593)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 188 spots (#382 → #570)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 84 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
39.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#79

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-25 05:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 84 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars
651
Forks
80
Last Push
2026-06-02
84 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
60
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
13
Rank Change
▼1
was #620

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

40.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AgentLite Agent Frameworks average (119 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.0 / 25
4.1 below avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.2 / 17
in line with avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
6.4 / 20
7.7 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.1 / 20
2.2 below avg 11.3

Activity Inputs

39.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
13.3 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026
Signed Commits
Unable to query
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 3

Is AgentLite safe?

Public trust evidence for AgentLite is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does AgentLite publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AgentLite. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AgentLite have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AgentLite has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AgentLite actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 84 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does AgentLite use?
AgentLite ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AgentLite's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-02
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain AgentLite?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AgentLite from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 15HVTrust 5Score 1Fresh 1
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#602 → #616)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#570 → #593)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 188 spots (#382 → #570)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#324 → #349)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#308 → #324)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#271 → #308)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#217 → #249)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#200 → #217)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#180 → #191)
2026-06-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#162 → #175)
2026-06-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 33 spots (#190 → #157)
2026-06-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.4pts (35.0 → 48.4)
2026-06-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#156 → #190)
2026-06-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 13.5pts (48.5 → 35.0)
2026-06-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 34 spots (#190 → #156)
2026-06-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.5pts (35.0 → 48.5)
2026-06-02
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#169 → #146)
2026-06-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.6pts (34.3 → 46.9)
2026-06-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 29pts (26 → 54)
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#149 → #169)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (25.3 → 35.3)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 40.5 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentlite.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentlite)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentlite"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentlite.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON