Browser Use
🌐 Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.
Compare Browser Use
How does it stack up against its Browser & Computer Use neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Is Browser Use safe? Browser Use scores 73.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #103 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.0/10; 75% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Ranked neighbours in Browser & Computer Use
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Activity & Reach
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions vs Browser & Computer Use
73.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceBrowser Use Browser & Computer Use average (41 agents)
Activity Inputs
99.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Is Browser Use safe?
Does Browser Use publish package provenance?
Does Browser Use have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Browser Use actively maintained?
What license does Browser Use use?
Are Browser Use's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare Browser Use head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Browser Use's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Browser Use?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Browser Use from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/browser-use)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/browser-use"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/browser-use.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Browser & Computer Use
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON