RegistryCompare › Agent Browser vs Browser Use

Agent Browser vs Browser Use

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Browser and Browser Use, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agent Browser leads on trust — 86.7/100 (Grade A) vs 73.6/100 (Grade B), a 13.1-point gap. Note: Agent Browser's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Browservercel-labs/agent-browser Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use
HVTrust score 86.7 73.6
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #26 #86
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #2 #6
GitHub stars 39.9k 107.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10 5.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 923k/wk 13.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.9 9.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.2 12.8
Maintenance / 20 18.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.0 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Browserbase, Redis 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Browserbase, …
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Browser profile Browser Use profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →