Registry › Compare › Browser Use vs Skyvern

Browser Use vs Skyvern

Skyvern leads on trust: 87.0/100 (Grade A) against 72.2/100 (Grade B), a 14.8-point gap. Browser Use leads on adoption; Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

B Browser Use 72.2

Agents that use the browser.

browser-use/browser-use · #293 overall · #12 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Browser Use if adoption matters most.

+5.3Adoption: 2.4M weekly downloads against 1.5k

A Skyvern 87.0

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Skyvern-AI/skyvern · #55 overall · #6 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+13.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 35%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+2.2Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 4.8

Where they differ

7.8

Safety / IntegritySkyvern +13.9

21.7

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceSkyvern +7.2

18.0

12.6

TransparencySkyvern +2.2

14.8

20.0

AdoptionBrowser Use +5.3

14.7

+1.0

Runtime calibrationBrowser Use +3.2

-2.2

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Use and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use	SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score	72.2	87.0
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	A	A
Overall rank	#293	#55
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#12	#6
GitHub stars	117.1k	23.1k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.8 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	2.4M/wk	1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	7.8	21.7
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.6	14.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	20.0	14.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …	5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Browser Use profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →