Xiaohongshu MCP
MCP for xiaohongshu.com
Is Xiaohongshu MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Xiaohongshu MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Xiaohongshu MCP scores 57.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #713 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Xiaohongshu MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #392 MCP Youtube Transcript 57.3 +0.1
- #393 Mondaycom MCP 57.2 ±0
- #394 Xiaohongshu MCP 57.2 this agent
- #395 Browser Tools MCP 57.1 −0.1
- #396 Logic Pro MCP 57.0 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Xiaohongshu MCP’s 57.2.
Where the 57.2 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
57.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceXiaohongshu MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
78.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Xiaohongshu MCP
Does Xiaohongshu MCP publish package provenance?
Does Xiaohongshu MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Xiaohongshu MCP actively maintained?
What license does Xiaohongshu MCP use?
Are Xiaohongshu MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Xiaohongshu MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Xiaohongshu MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Xiaohongshu MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/xiaohongshu-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/xiaohongshu-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/xiaohongshu-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON