MCP Document Reader
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server exposes tools to read multiple document types including DOCX, PDF, Excel, and TXT. This has been tested on Trae Desktop.
Is MCP Document Reader safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare MCP Document Reader
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP Document Reader scores 49.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #951 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.6/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-03-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Document Reader compares in MCP Servers
- #546 SharpLens 49.6 ±0
- #547 MCP Turso Cloud 49.6 ±0
- #548 MCP Document Reader 49.6 this agent
- #549 Sap Adt MCP 49.5 −0.1
- #550 Druid MCP Server 49.4 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Document Reader’s 49.6.
Where the 49.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
49.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Document Reader MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
12.5 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Document Reader
Does MCP Document Reader publish package provenance?
Does MCP Document Reader have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Document Reader actively maintained?
What license does MCP Document Reader use?
Are MCP Document Reader's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Document Reader's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Document Reader?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Document Reader from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-document-reader)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-document-reader"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-document-reader.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON