Is Laravel MCP Companion safe to use?

Laravel MCP Companion has an HVTrust score of 60.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #662 of 1378 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Laravel MCP Companion?

Laravel MCP Companion scores 60.6/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 38 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Laravel MCP Companion

Repository

A Laravel developer's MCP companion. Get the absolute best advice, recommendations, and up-to-date documentation for the entire Laravel ecosystem.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Laravel MCP Companion safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 79%

Last push today

Compare Laravel MCP Companion

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Laravel MCP Companion scores 60.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #662 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.4/10; 79% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Laravel MCP Companion could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 6.4 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0, Contributors 0 +5.4 → 66.0 B · #276 of 781
Sign every commit79% signed today +1.0 → 61.6 C · #352 of 781

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Laravel MCP Companion and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

Source Partly signed

github.com/brianirish/laravel-mcp-companion, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-18. 79% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
Review and release Mixed

OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 6.4/10 (scanned Oct 15, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection3
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 9

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10
Published packages None

Distributed as the container image ghcr.io/brianirish/laravel-mcp-companion:v0.13.0; HVTracker doesn't check that registry's source link yet.

Changes to this chain

2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 6.4/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

GitHub repository data
Package downloads (missing)
Supply-chain checks
Public actions (missing)
Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Laravel MCP Companion’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Laravel MCP Companion compares in MCP Servers

#360 Porkbun DNS 🐷 60.8 +0.2
#361 Nse Bse Indian Stock Market Data MCP 60.8 +0.2
#362 Laravel MCP Companion 60.6 this agent
#363 InsForge InsForge 60.6 ±0
#364 MCP Sqlite Tools 60.6 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Laravel MCP Companion’s 60.6.

Where the 60.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

60.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Laravel MCP Companion MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

12.0 / 25

1.4 above avg 10.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.8 below avg 13.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.9 / 17

1.6 above avg 12.3

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

18.1 / 20

5.9 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

3.8 / 20

3.6 below avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#646 → #656)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Laravel MCP Companion View MCP Servers Report missing data

58.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#362

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-17

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-10-18

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #661

Analysis

Activity Inputs

58.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

18.9 / 25

CommunityFork signal

5.0 / 20

Common questions about Laravel MCP Companion

Laravel MCP Companion has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Laravel MCP Companion publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Laravel MCP Companion. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Laravel MCP Companion have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Laravel MCP Companion has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Laravel MCP Companion actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Laravel MCP Companion use?

Laravel MCP Companion ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Laravel MCP Companion's commits signed?

79% of the last 100 commits to Laravel MCP Companion are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Laravel MCP Companion appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Laravel MCP Companion's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain Laravel MCP Companion?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Laravel MCP Companion from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#646 → #656)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 62 spots (#707 → #645)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 28.6pts (30.7 → 59.3)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #707

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-20

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank rose 518 spots (#1160 → #642)

2026-09-20

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 19.1pts (40.1 → 59.2)

2026-09-19

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 521 spots (#639 → #1160)

2026-09-19

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 19.1pts (59.2 → 40.1)

2026-09-15

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 525 spots (#1163 → #638)

2026-09-15

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 19.0pts (40.0 → 59.0)

2026-09-14

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 524 spots (#639 → #1163)

2026-09-14

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 18.9pts (58.9 → 40.0)

2026-09-10

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-10

Rank Moved

Rank rose 525 spots (#1155 → #630)

2026-09-10

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 18.9pts (39.8 → 58.7)

2026-09-09

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 532 spots (#623 → #1155)

2026-09-09

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 18.9pts (58.7 → 39.8)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 43 spots (#575 → #618)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 73 spots (#498 → #571)

2026-09-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank rose 538 spots (#1036 → #498)

2026-09-04

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 18.8pts (39.7 → 58.5)

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 590 spots (#446 → #1036)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 19.5pts (59.2 → 39.7)

2026-09-02

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 461 spots (#907 → #446)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 18.5pts (40.7 → 59.2)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 35 spots (#872 → #907)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#843 → #872)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#807 → #843)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 45 spots (#762 → #807)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#736 → #762)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#713 → #736)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 6.4/10

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 376 spots (#1089 → #713)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 21.0pts (19.9 → 40.9)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1080 → #1090)

2026-08-21

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#1097 → #1087)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 219 spots (#873 → #1092)

2026-08-17

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.4pts (24.2 → 19.8)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank rose 207 spots (#1080 → #873)

2026-08-16

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.5pts (19.7 → 24.2)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 198 spots (#884 → #1082)

2026-08-12

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.0pts (23.7 → 19.7)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 277 spots (#829 → #1106)

2026-08-10

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.4pts (23.7 → 19.3)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1025

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/laravel-mcp-companion.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/laravel-mcp-companion)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/laravel-mcp-companion"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/laravel-mcp-companion.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON

Laravel MCP Companion

How Laravel MCP Companion could raise its score

Chain of custody

Source Partly signed

Review and release Mixed

Published packages None

Changes to this chain

Evidence behind this score

Verify this score yourself

What this score doesn’t check

How Laravel MCP Companion compares in MCP Servers

Where the 60.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

Quick Trust Read

Rank Trend

Activity & Reach

Analysis

Activity Inputs

Common questions about Laravel MCP Companion

AI agent surface

Maintain Laravel MCP Companion?

Reputation Timeline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

Other agents in MCP Servers