updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Arxiv MCP Server

blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server

A Model Context Protocol server for searching and analyzing arXiv papers

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
39.1/100
Rank #639 of 1283
Compare Arxiv MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-29 · 14d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is Arxiv MCP Server safe? Arxiv MCP Server scores 39.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #639 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 37% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#267 MindsHub — 39.3 (D) → #268 Interactive Leetcode MCP — 39.1 (D) → #270 Korean Law MCP — 39.1 (D) → #271 Brave Search MCP Server — 39.0 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#610 → #636)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #599
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Arxiv MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
71.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#269
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 14 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.0k
Forks
246
Last Push
2026-07-29
14 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
18
Downloads (7d)
12,298
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
8
Rank Change
▲2
was #641

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

39.1 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Arxiv MCP Server MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.8 / 25
3.2 below avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.2 / 20
3.8 above avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
13.8 / 20
8.0 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

71.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
15.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
37%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Arxiv MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for Arxiv MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Arxiv MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Arxiv MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Arxiv MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Arxiv MCP Server. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Arxiv MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.
What license does Arxiv MCP Server use?
Arxiv MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Arxiv MCP Server's commits signed?
37% of the last 100 commits to Arxiv MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Arxiv MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
Marketplace
Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Arxiv MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Arxiv MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#610 → #636)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #599
GitHub → PyPI: arxiv-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 39.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/arxiv-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/arxiv-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/arxiv-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/arxiv-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON