x64dbg MCP Server

x64dbg-MCP Server is a native MCP (Model Context Protocol) plugin for x64dbg that exposes the debugger's full functionality over HTTP. Connect any MCP-compatible AI assistant and control x64dbg programmatically: set breakpoints, step through code, read memory, dump registers, and more. Built with…

MCP Servers Zig Listed MIT

Is x64dbg MCP Server safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 5d ago
Compare x64dbg MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: x64dbg MCP Server scores 48.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #1045 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.8/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-10-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How x64dbg MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships x64dbg MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Unsigned

    github.com/duty1g/x64dbg-mcp-server, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-12. None of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so no change traces to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.8/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review1
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 1
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. x64dbg MCP Server is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-05 OSSF Scorecard: 2.3/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues x64dbg MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How x64dbg MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #592 Opendocswork MCP 48.9 +0.1
  2. #593 Notebooklm MCP Secure 48.8 ±0
  3. #594 x64dbg MCP Server 48.8 this agent
  4. #595 Markdownify MCP 48.7 −0.1
  5. #596 Apple Rag MCP 48.7 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks x64dbg MCP Server’s 48.8.

Where the 48.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

48.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

x64dbg MCP Server MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.5 / 25
7.0 below avg 10.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.7 below avg 13.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.9 / 17
1.4 below avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.4 / 20
1.1 above avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.2 / 20
0.8 above avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1020 → #1031)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#994 → #1014)
2026-10-11
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
66.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#594

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-17 20:06 UTC · Repo last pushed 5 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-17

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.5k
Forks
285
Last Push
2026-10-12
5 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
6?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼9
was #1036

Analysis

Activity Inputs

66.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.3 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
10.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.4 / 20

Common questions about x64dbg MCP Server

Public trust evidence for x64dbg MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does x64dbg MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for x64dbg MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does x64dbg MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
x64dbg MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is x64dbg MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 5 day(s).
What license does x64dbg MCP Server use?
x64dbg MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are x64dbg MCP Server's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to x64dbg MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
x64dbg MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to x64dbg MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain x64dbg MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores x64dbg MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 23Grade 7HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Score 1
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1020 → #1031)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#994 → #1014)
2026-10-11
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#982 → #994)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#958 → #973)
2026-10-08
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 42 spots (#1000 → #958)
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#1010 → #990)
2026-10-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#955 → #1010)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#944 → #955)
2026-09-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#964 → #943)
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 48 spots (#1007 → #959)
2026-09-25
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 108 spots (#899 → #1007)
2026-09-25
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.7pts (51.3 → 47.6)
2026-09-25
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (72 → 66)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 393 spots (#500 → #893)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.4pts (40.9 → 51.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #500
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#899 → #881)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#880 → #892)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#870 → #880)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#886 → #870)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#868 → #886)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#855 → #868)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#815 → #855)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#804 → #815)
2026-09-05
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.3/10
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 463 spots (#1267 → #804)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.1pts (24.2 → 51.3)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1255 → #1267)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#1218 → #1255)
2026-09-02
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1218

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 48.8 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/x64dbg-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/x64dbg-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/x64dbg-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/x64dbg-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON