JS Reverse MCP
AI Agent-first JS 逆向 MCP Server:有头 Chrome 调试、断点、网络/WebSocket 分析、Patchright 反检测,可选 CloakBrowser。
Is JS Reverse MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare JS Reverse MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: JS Reverse MCP scores 58.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #663 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How JS Reverse MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #365 Google Surf MCP 59.2 +0.3
- #366 MCP Klever Vm 59.1 +0.2
- #367 JS Reverse MCP 58.9 this agent
- #368 E Arveldaja MCP 58.9 ±0
- #369 MCP Abap Adt 58.9 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks JS Reverse MCP’s 58.9.
Where the 58.9 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
58.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceJS Reverse MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
60.5 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about JS Reverse MCP
Does JS Reverse MCP publish package provenance?
Does JS Reverse MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is JS Reverse MCP actively maintained?
What license does JS Reverse MCP use?
Are JS Reverse MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to JS Reverse MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain JS Reverse MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores JS Reverse MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/js-reverse-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/js-reverse-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/js-reverse-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON