Is Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise safe to use?

Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise has an HVTrust score of 18.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #1131 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise?

Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise scores 18.6/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 47 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise

microsoft/EnterpriseMCP

MCP Servers Grade D Listed CC-BY-4.0

18.6/100

Rank #1131 of 1283

Compare Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade D · 1/5 signals

Last push

2026-06-04 · 69d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise safe? Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise scores 18.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #1131 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 50% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#639 Studio MCP — 18.7 (D) → #640 CodeWiki MCP — AI-generated docs for GitHub repos — 18.7 (D) → #642 Gemini Cloud Assist MCP — 18.6 (D) → #643 Clarifyprompt MCP — 18.6 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 68 spots (#1063 → #1131)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1057

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 69 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise View MCP Servers Report missing data

31.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#641

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-06-04

69 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #1131

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

18.6 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

2.5 / 25

2.5 below avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

7.4 / 20

5.0 below avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.0 / 20

1.8 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

31.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

10.1 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

15.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

5.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

50%

of last 100 commits verified

Is Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise safe?

Public trust evidence for Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 69 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise use?

Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise ships under CC-BY-4.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise's commits signed?

50% of the last 100 commits to Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Implemented

Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Microsoft MCP Server for Enterprise from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 68 spots (#1063 → #1131)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1057

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/microsoft-mcp-server-for-enterprise.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/microsoft-mcp-server-for-enterprise)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/microsoft-mcp-server-for-enterprise"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/microsoft-mcp-server-for-enterprise.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON