Turbovec

A vector index built on TurboQuant, written in Rust with Python bindings

Needs review Python Grade C Listed MIT
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
58.2/100 · Grade C
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-26 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +7

Is Turbovec safe? Turbovec scores 58.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #231 of 418 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
58.2/100 · Grade C
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
18.2/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
6.9/25
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#250 → #235)
2026-07-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#270 → #250)
2026-07-24
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (72 → 79)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
83.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
58.2
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#231
Global Rank · of 418
#5

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-26 21:00 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
14.4k
Forks
1.3k
Last Push
2026-07-26
today
Commits (4 wk)
35
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
11
Rank Change
▲4
was #235

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

58.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.9 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.2 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.2 / 20
Adoption60% stars · 40% downloads, log-scaled
10.0 / 20

Activity Inputs

83.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
19.4 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 11, 2026 (refresh pending)
Signed Commits
Unable to query
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 5
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 5

Is Turbovec safe?

Turbovec has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Turbovec publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Turbovec. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Turbovec have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Turbovec has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Turbovec actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Turbovec use?
Turbovec ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Needs review

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • code
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Turbovec?

HVTrust scores Turbovec from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Rank 12Score 5Grade 3Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-07-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#250 → #235)
2026-07-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#270 → #250)
2026-07-24
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (72 → 79)
2026-07-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#289 → #270)
2026-07-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 8pts (64 → 72)
2026-07-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-07-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#312 → #284)
2026-07-19
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 5pts (59 → 64)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#284 → #307)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#271 → #284)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#239 → #271)
2026-07-10
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-07-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#226 → #238)
2026-07-10
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (66 → 60)
2026-07-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#215 → #226)
2026-07-09
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (72 → 66)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#180 → #204)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#170 → #180)
2026-06-18
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-06-18
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-06-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 76 spots (#221 → #145)
2026-06-18
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 34.2pts (24.3 → 58.5)
2026-06-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #213

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 58.2 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/turbovec.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/turbovec)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/turbovec"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/turbovec.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Needs review

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON