Registry › Compare › Hivemind vs Turbovec

Hivemind vs Turbovec

Turbovec leads on trust: 61.6/100 (Grade C) against 53.7/100 (Grade C), a 7.9-point gap. Turbovec leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

C Hivemind 53.7

Hivemind turns your traces into reusable skills across agents

activeloopai/hivemind · #888 overall · #7 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Hivemind doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

C Turbovec 61.6

A vector index built on TurboQuant, written in Rust with Python bindings

RyanCodrai/turbovec · #643 overall · #6 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Turbovec if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+3.8Safety / Integrity: 14% of recent commits signed, against 12%
+2.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 4.5
+2.5Adoption: 17.4k GitHub stars against 1.6k

Where they differ

6.2

Safety / IntegrityTurbovec +3.8

10.0

12.3

TransparencyTurbovec +2.5

14.8

16.0

MaintenanceHivemind +0.2

15.8

7.7

AdoptionTurbovec +2.5

10.2

+0.7

Runtime calibrationHivemind +0.7

+0.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hivemind and Turbovec, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Hivemindactiveloopai/hivemind	TurbovecRyanCodrai/turbovec
HVTrust score	53.7	61.6
Evidence grade	C	C
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#888	#643
Rank in Needs review	#7	#6
GitHub stars	1.6k	17.4k
Last updated	2d ago	14d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.5 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	6.2	10.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.3	14.8
Maintenance / 20	16.0	15.8
Adoption / 20	7.7	10.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Hivemind profile Turbovec profile More Needs review →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →