Registry › Compare › Eve vs Turbovec

Eve vs Turbovec

Eve leads on trust: 66.6/100 (Grade B) against 58.6/100 (Grade C), a 8.0-point gap. Eve leads on maintenance and supply-chain integrity; Turbovec leads on transparency and adoption.

B Eve 66.6

The Open Framework for Building Agents

vercel/eve · #425 overall · #1 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Eve if maintenance and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+6.6Maintenance
+2.7Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 4%

C Turbovec 58.6

A vector index built on TurboQuant, written in Rust with Python bindings

RyanCodrai/turbovec · #682 overall · #6 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Turbovec if transparency and adoption matter most.

+1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 5.7
+1.2Adoption: 17.3k GitHub stars against 5.5k

Where they differ

12.1

Safety / IntegrityEve +2.7

9.4

13.3

TransparencyTurbovec +1.5

14.8

20.0

MaintenanceEve +6.6

13.4

9.0

AdoptionTurbovec +1.2

10.2

+1.4

Runtime calibrationEve +1.4

+0.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Eve and Turbovec, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Evevercel/eve	TurbovecRyanCodrai/turbovec
HVTrust score	66.6	58.6
Evidence grade	B	C
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#425	#682
Rank in Needs review	#1	#6
GitHub stars	5.5k	17.3k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.7 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.1	9.4
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.3	14.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	13.4
Adoption / 20	9.0	10.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	extensions	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Eve profile Turbovec profile More Needs review →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →