Is TencentDB Agent Memory safe to use?

TencentDB Agent Memory has an HVTrust score of 58.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #370 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for TencentDB Agent Memory?

TencentDB Agent Memory scores 58.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 23.0k GitHub stars and is categorized under Needs review.

TencentDB Agent Memory

TencentCloud/TencentDB-Agent-Memory

TencentDB Agent Memory is a team-level memory hub for AI Agents — turning conversations, docs, and code into four reusab

Needs review TypeScript Grade C Listed NOASSERTION

58.1/100

Rank #370 of 1308

Compare TencentDB Agent Memory

How does it stack up against its Needs review neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-15 · 4d ago

Recent change

Rank +5

Is TencentDB Agent Memory safe? TencentDB Agent Memory scores 58.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #370 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.0/10; 47% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Needs review

#4 ASM — 60.2 (C) → #5 Engram — 59.5 (C) → #7 Hivemind — 57.7 (C) → #8 AI Town — 43.3 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#355 → #370)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#374 → #359)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#361 → #374)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with Turbovec Get email alerts for TencentDB Agent Memory View Needs review Report missing data

82.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Needs review

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars

23.0k

Forks

2.1k

Last Push

2026-08-15

4 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

141

Rank Change

▼15

was #355

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Needs review

58.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

TencentDB Agent Memory Needs review average (11 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.3 / 25

in line with avg 7.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

in line with avg 10.8

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.9 / 17

in line with avg 12.3

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.7 / 20

2.0 above avg 14.7

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.5 / 20

1.4 above avg 9.1

Activity Inputs

82.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

26.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

15.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

15.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 17, 2026

Signed Commits

47%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 1

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Is TencentDB Agent Memory safe?

TencentDB Agent Memory has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does TencentDB Agent Memory publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for TencentDB Agent Memory. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does TencentDB Agent Memory have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

TencentDB Agent Memory has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is TencentDB Agent Memory actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).

What license does TencentDB Agent Memory use?

TencentDB Agent Memory ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are TencentDB Agent Memory's commits signed?

46% of the last 100 commits to TencentDB Agent Memory are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare TencentDB Agent Memory head-to-head

TencentDB Agent Memory vs Turbovec → TencentDB Agent Memory vs Eve → TencentDB Agent Memory vs Obsidian Second Brain →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

TencentDB Agent Memory appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

code

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain TencentDB Agent Memory?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores TencentDB Agent Memory from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#355 → #370)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#374 → #359)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#361 → #374)

2026-08-14

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#370 → #359)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#352 → #370)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#371 → #352)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#366 → #379)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 89 spots (#276 → #365)

2026-07-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#281 → #295)

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#249 → #265)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#234 → #249)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#212 → #234)

2026-07-06

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#213 → #200)

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#179 → #199)

2026-06-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#169 → #179)

2026-06-19

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-06-19

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 71 spots (#226 → #155)

2026-06-19

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 32.3pts (24.0 → 56.3)

2026-06-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #217

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tencentdb-agent-memory.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tencentdb-agent-memory)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tencentdb-agent-memory"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tencentdb-agent-memory.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Needs review

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON