RegistryCompare › Eve vs TencentDB Agent Memory

Eve vs TencentDB Agent Memory

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Eve and TencentDB Agent Memory, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Eve leads on trust — 63.2/100 (Grade C) vs 56.8/100 (Grade C), a 6.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Evevercel/eve TencentDB Agent MemoryTencentCloud/TencentDB-Agent-Memory
HVTrust score 63.2 56.8
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #253 #363
Rank in Needs review #2 #7
GitHub stars 4.5k 17.9k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 4.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.4 7.3
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.8 11.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 15.7
Adoption / 20 8.8 10.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Eve profile TencentDB Agent Memory profile More Needs review →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →