RegistryCompare › Eve vs TencentDB Agent Memory

Eve vs TencentDB Agent Memory

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Eve and TencentDB Agent Memory, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Eve leads on trust — 62.3/100 (Grade C) vs 53.1/100 (Grade C), a 9.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Evevercel/eve TencentDB Agent MemoryTencentCloud/TencentDB-Agent-Memory
HVTrust score 62.3 53.1
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #188 #295
Rank in Needs review #1 #7
GitHub stars 4.3k 13.4k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 3.9 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.4 7.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.8 11.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 15.3
Adoption / 20 8.7 9.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Eve profile TencentDB Agent Memory profile More Needs review →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →