Text To Cad

A library of agent skills for CAD, CAE and CAM

Agent Skills Python Listed MIT

Is Text To Cad safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 36%
Last push today
Compare Text To Cad
Suggest a correction

In detail: Text To Cad scores 60.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #99 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 36% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Text To Cad compares in Agent Skills

  1. #97 Cc Skills Golang 60.4 +0.1
  2. #98 Dotnet Skills 60.4 +0.1
  3. #99 Text To Cad 60.3 this agent
  4. #100 drawio-skill 60.3 ±0
  5. #101 I Have Adhd 60.2 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Text To Cad’s 60.3.

Where the 60.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

60.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Text To Cad Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.4 / 25
0.7 below avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.3 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.8 above avg 14.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.1 / 20
1.1 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 59 spots (#33 → #92)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
90.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#99

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
16.4k
Forks
1.7k
Last Push
2026-09-26
today
Commits (4 wk)
329
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲1
was #100

Analysis

Activity Inputs

90.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026
Signed Commits
36%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 4
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Text To Cad

Text To Cad has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Text To Cad publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Text To Cad. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Text To Cad have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Text To Cad has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Text To Cad actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Text To Cad use?
Text To Cad ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Text To Cad's commits signed?
36% of the last 100 commits to Text To Cad are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Text To Cad's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain Text To Cad?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Text To Cad from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 59 spots (#33 → #92)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (50.3 → 60.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #33
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-12
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.9/10
2026-09-12
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 263 spots (#340 → #77)
2026-09-12
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 36.0pts (25.3 → 61.3)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#330 → #340)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#275 → #288)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#261 → #275)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#249 → #261)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#233 → #249)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#198 → #233)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#165 → #198)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#143 → #165)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#122 → #143)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 69 spots (#53 → #122)
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #55

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 60.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/text-to-cad.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/text-to-cad)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/text-to-cad"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/text-to-cad.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON