updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Open Code Review

alibaba/open-code-review

Fast, efficient, battle-tested at Alibaba's scale. Hybrid architecture code review tool: deterministic pipelines + LLM A

Agent Skills Go Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
46.3/100
Rank #7 of 148
Compare Open Code Review

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-12 · 0d ago
Recent change
New

Is Open Code Review safe? Open Code Review scores 46.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #7 of 148 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Skills

#5 Dev Browser — 65.3 (B) → #6 Pg Aiguide — 62.4 (C) → #8 Obsidian Wiki — 45.5 (D) → #9 Claude Mem — 45.0 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #7
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with Larksuite Cli Get email alerts for Open Code Review View Agent Skills Report missing data
90.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#7
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
20.2k
Forks
1.4k
Last Push
2026-08-12
today
Commits (4 wk)
215
Downloads (7d)
64,861
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
56
Rank Change
=
was #7

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Skills

46.3 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Open Code Review Agent Skills average (148 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.9 / 25
2.2 above avg 2.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.5 below avg 11.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
4.9 above avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
16.7 / 20
7.5 above avg 9.2

Activity Inputs

90.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Open Code Review safe?

Public trust evidence for Open Code Review is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Open Code Review publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Open Code Review. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Open Code Review have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Open Code Review. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Open Code Review actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Open Code Review use?
Open Code Review ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Open Code Review's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to Open Code Review are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Open Code Review head-to-head

Open Code Review vs Larksuite Cli → Open Code Review vs Cc Safety Net → Open Code Review vs Better Harness →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Open Code Review appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Open Code Review?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Open Code Review from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #7
GitHub → npm: @alibaba-group/open-code-review

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 46.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-code-review.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-code-review)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-code-review"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-code-review.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON