Is Lobehub safe to use?

Lobehub has an HVTrust score of 66.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #50 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Lobehub?

Lobehub scores 66.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 82.8k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Lobehub

lobehub/lobehub

🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed NOASSERTION Source-available

Is Lobehub safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 100%

Last push today

Compare Lobehub

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Lobehub scores 66.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #50 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.2/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Lobehub compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Lobehub’s 66.7.

Where the 66.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

66.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Lobehub Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.2 / 25

2.1 above avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.1 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

20.0 / 20

5.8 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

15.0 / 20

6.0 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, Postgres

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Lobehub View Agent Skills Report missing data

99.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#50

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

82.8k

Forks

15.9k

Last Push

2026-09-26

today

Commits (4 wk)

885

Downloads (7d)

234

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

370

Rank Change

▼1

was #49

Analysis

Activity Inputs

99.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

29.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

19.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 22, 2026

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 10

Security-Policy 4

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Lobehub

Source-available software. A lower HVTrust score reflects fewer public supply-chain artifacts (open license, build provenance, signed commits) — not a security finding. Lobehub may have internal security practices not visible through public signals.

Lobehub has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Lobehub publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Lobehub. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Lobehub have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Lobehub has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Lobehub actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Lobehub use?

Lobehub ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Lobehub's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to Lobehub are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Lobehub appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

4 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

browser
database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

low confidence

Unknown

Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Lobehub's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, Postgres

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Lobehub?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Lobehub from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, Postgres

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 170 spots (#216 → #46)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 32.6pts (34.1 → 66.7)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #216

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#23 → #33)

2026-09-04

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.9/10

2026-09-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank rose 221 spots (#244 → #23)

2026-09-04

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 29.9pts (37.8 → 67.7)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#229 → #244)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#217 → #229)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#204 → #217)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#188 → #204)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#156 → #188)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#120 → #156)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#94 → #120)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#72 → #94)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 50 spots (#22 → #72)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #17

GitHub → npm: @lobehub/lobehub

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/lobehub.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/lobehub)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/lobehub"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/lobehub.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON