Scout MCP Local

Scout’s local MCP puts metrics, traces and errors right in your AI agent. For teams that do it all.

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed MIT
62.7/100
Rank #391 of 1320
Compare Scout MCP Local

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-06-20 · 76d ago
Recent change
Rank +4

Is Scout MCP Local safe? Scout MCP Local scores 62.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #391 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-20. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#371 → #391)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#351 → #371)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#305 → #335)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 76 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
24.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#187

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 76 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
30
Forks
1
Last Push
2026-06-20
76 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
30
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▼20
was #371

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

62.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Scout MCP Local MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.5 / 25
8.9 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.7 / 17
0.9 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
6.9 / 20
5.3 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.6 / 20
0.7 below avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

24.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
14.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Scout MCP Local safe?

Scout MCP Local has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Scout MCP Local publish package provenance?
Yes. Scout MCP Local's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Scout MCP Local have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Scout MCP Local has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Scout MCP Local actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 76 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Scout MCP Local use?
Scout MCP Local ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Scout MCP Local's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to Scout MCP Local are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Scout MCP Local appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Scout MCP Local?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Scout MCP Local from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 13Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#371 → #391)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#351 → #371)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#305 → #335)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#315 → #305)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#299 → #315)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.9/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 153 spots (#439 → #286)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.2pts (53.4 → 63.6)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#422 → #437)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#440 → #423)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#427 → #441)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#438 → #426)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#410 → #425)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#424 → #410)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#405 → #423)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #403

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.7 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/scout-mcp-local.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/scout-mcp-local)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/scout-mcp-local"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/scout-mcp-local.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON