Is OpenClaw MCP Server safe to use?

OpenClaw MCP Server has an HVTrust score of 69.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #352 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for OpenClaw MCP Server?

OpenClaw MCP Server scores 69.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 184 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

OpenClaw MCP Server

freema/openclaw-mcp

🦞 MCP server for OpenClaw - secure bridge between Claude.ai and your self-hosted OpenClaw assistant with OAuth2 authentication

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is OpenClaw MCP Server safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 28%

Last push 7d ago

Compare OpenClaw MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: OpenClaw MCP Server scores 69.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #352 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.0/10; 28% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How OpenClaw MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

#209 Mnemoverse Memory 69.0 ±0
#210 Streamdeck MCP 69.0 ±0
#211 OpenClaw MCP Server 69.0 this agent
#212 Federal Compass MCP 68.9 −0.1
#213 MCP Probe Kit 68.8 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks OpenClaw MCP Server’s 69.0.

Where the 69.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

69.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

OpenClaw MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

13.9 / 25

3.6 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.9 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

12.1 / 20

in line with avg 12.0

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.4 / 20

1.2 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#336 → #351)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for OpenClaw MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

48.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#211

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

184

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-19

7 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

159

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲6

was #358

Analysis

Activity Inputs

48.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

13.6 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

3.8 / 25

CommunityFork signal

6.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

4.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026

Signed Commits

28%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 8

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 3

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about OpenClaw MCP Server

OpenClaw MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does OpenClaw MCP Server publish package provenance?

Yes. OpenClaw MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does OpenClaw MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

OpenClaw MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is OpenClaw MCP Server actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 7 day(s).

What license does OpenClaw MCP Server use?

OpenClaw MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are OpenClaw MCP Server's commits signed?

28% of the last 100 commits to OpenClaw MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

OpenClaw MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to OpenClaw MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain OpenClaw MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores OpenClaw MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#336 → #351)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 656 spots (#992 → #336)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 44.4pts (25.1 → 69.5)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #992

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#321 → #334)

2026-09-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 77 spots (#398 → #321)

2026-09-19

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.4pts (67.0 → 70.4)

2026-09-19

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 8pts (41 → 49)

2026-09-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#356 → #389)

2026-09-12

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10

2026-09-12

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 250 spots (#598 → #348)

2026-09-12

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.4pts (60.2 → 68.6)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#583 → #598)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 27 spots (#552 → #579)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#542 → #552)

2026-09-07

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank rose 561 spots (#1103 → #542)

2026-09-07

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 21.0pts (40.2 → 61.2)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1086 → #1103)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 41 spots (#1045 → #1086)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1021 → #1045)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 57 spots (#964 → #1021)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#917 → #964)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#881 → #917)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#850 → #881)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 35 spots (#815 → #850)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 49 spots (#766 → #815)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#740 → #766)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#719 → #740)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 99 spots (#620 → #719)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#603 → #616)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#590 → #600)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #591

GitHub → npm: openclaw-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/openclaw-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/openclaw-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/openclaw-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/openclaw-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON