updated 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC

MCP Fiscal Brasil

Repository Website

Servidor MCP fiscal brasileiro: CNPJ, NF-e, NFS-e, CT-e, SPED, eSocial, Simples Nacional, Reforma 2026. 44 tools, zero-cadastro, tabelas offline. Python.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is MCP Fiscal Brasil safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 99%
Last push 10d ago
Advisories None known
Compare MCP Fiscal Brasil

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Fiscal Brasil scores 72.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #331 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.7/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (mcp-fiscal-brasil); last pushed 2026-11-01. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Fiscal Brasil could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships MCP Fiscal Brasil and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/DeHor-Labs/mcp-fiscal-brasil, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-01. 99% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Strong

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 7.7/10 (scanned Nov 8, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review10
    • Branch Protection6
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies2
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 6
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 10
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 2
    SAST 10
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: mcp-fiscal-brasil 0.5.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-11).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 7.1/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues MCP Fiscal Brasil’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How MCP Fiscal Brasil compares in MCP Servers

  1. #193 iCloud MCP 72.4 +0.4
  2. #194 OpenClaw MCP Server 72.3 +0.3
  3. #195 MCP Fiscal Brasil 72.0 this agent
  4. #196 Polymarket Agent MCP 72.0 ±0
  5. #197 Scout MCP Local 72.0 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Fiscal Brasil’s 72.0.

Where the 72.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

72.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Fiscal Brasil MCP Servers average (779 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.6 / 25
3.8 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
15.0 / 17
2.7 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.2 / 20
4.9 above avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.4 / 20
1.8 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#322 → #332)
2026-11-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#338 → #307)
2026-11-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#354 → #338)
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
66.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#195
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 10 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
423
Forks
90
Last Push
2026-11-01
10 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
28
Downloads (7d)
196
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
▲1
was #332

Analysis

Activity Inputs

66.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
15.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.1 / 20

Common questions about MCP Fiscal Brasil

MCP Fiscal Brasil has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MCP Fiscal Brasil publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Fiscal Brasil. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Fiscal Brasil have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Fiscal Brasil has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Fiscal Brasil actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 10 days ago.
What license does MCP Fiscal Brasil use?
MCP Fiscal Brasil ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Fiscal Brasil's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to MCP Fiscal Brasil are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Fiscal Brasil appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Fiscal Brasil's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain MCP Fiscal Brasil?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Fiscal Brasil from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 25HVTrust 3Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1
2026-11-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#322 → #332)
2026-11-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#338 → #307)
2026-11-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#354 → #338)
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#304 → #346)
2026-10-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#310 → #297)
2026-10-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#326 → #310)
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 77 spots (#401 → #324)
2026-10-18
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.6pts (68.1 → 71.7)
2026-10-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#422 → #401)
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#363 → #405)
2026-10-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#352 → #363)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 66 spots (#420 → #354)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#408 → #424)
2026-09-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#431 → #408)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 250 spots (#676 → #426)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 35.0pts (31.3 → 66.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #676
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#392 → #415)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#357 → #387)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#349 → #359)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#328 → #349)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#256 → #321)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#237 → #247)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#214 → #237)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#187 → #210)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#176 → #186)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 7.1/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 490 spots (#666 → #176)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 30.9pts (38.1 → 69.0)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#656 → #669)
GitHub → Website → PyPI: mcp-fiscal-brasil

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 72.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-fiscal-brasil.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-fiscal-brasil)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-fiscal-brasil"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-fiscal-brasil.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON