updated 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC

MCP Fiscal Brasil

DeHor-Labs/mcp-fiscal-brasil

Servidor MCP fiscal brasileiro: CNPJ, NF-e, NFS-e, CT-e, SPED, eSocial, Simples Nacional, Reforma 2026. 44 tools, zero-c

MCP Servers Python Grade B Listed MIT
68.0/100
Rank #256 of 1320
Compare MCP Fiscal Brasil

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-03 · 1d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is MCP Fiscal Brasil safe? MCP Fiscal Brasil scores 68.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #256 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.1/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#122 Idea Reality MCP — 68.6 (B) → #123 Sfcc Dev MCP — 68.2 (B) → #125 Better Telegram MCP — 68.0 (B) → #126 CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server — 68.0 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#237 → #247)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#214 → #237)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#187 → #210)
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Fiscal Brasil View MCP Servers Report missing data
59.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#124
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
288
Forks
56
Last Push
2026-09-03
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
8?
Downloads (7d)
267
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
▼9
was #247

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

68.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Fiscal Brasil MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
13.8 / 25
4.2 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.5 / 17
2.7 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.8 / 20
1.6 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.1 / 20
2.8 above avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

59.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
11.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
7.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 31, 2026
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 10
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 7

Is MCP Fiscal Brasil safe?

MCP Fiscal Brasil has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MCP Fiscal Brasil publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Fiscal Brasil. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Fiscal Brasil have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Fiscal Brasil has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Fiscal Brasil actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does MCP Fiscal Brasil use?
MCP Fiscal Brasil ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Fiscal Brasil's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to MCP Fiscal Brasil are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Fiscal Brasil appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Fiscal Brasil?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Fiscal Brasil from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 7Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#237 → #247)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#214 → #237)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#187 → #210)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#176 → #186)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 7.1/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 490 spots (#666 → #176)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 30.9pts (38.1 → 69.0)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#656 → #669)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#629 → #654)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #629
GitHub → PyPI: mcp-fiscal-brasil

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 68.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-fiscal-brasil.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-fiscal-brasil)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-fiscal-brasil"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-fiscal-brasil.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON