Ris MCP Ts

MCP Server for the Austrian Legal Information System (RIS) - Access Austrian federal laws, state laws, court decisions and more

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Ris MCP Ts safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 77%
Last push 18d ago
Compare Ris MCP Ts
Suggest a correction

In detail: Ris MCP Ts scores 54.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #796 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 77% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Ris MCP Ts compares in MCP Servers

  1. #442 Fr24api MCP 54.7 +0.1
  2. #443 Happy Platform MCP 54.6 ±0
  3. #444 Ris MCP Ts 54.6 this agent
  4. #445 Reddit Research MCP 54.5 −0.1
  5. #446 Tradingview MCP 54.5 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Ris MCP Ts’s 54.6.

Where the 54.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

54.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Ris MCP Ts MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.7 / 25
in line with avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.2 / 17
1.0 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
14.8 / 20
2.7 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.1 / 20
4.1 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 283 spots (#506 → #789)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
45.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#444

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 18 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
18
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-09-08
18 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
9
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
3
Rank Change
▲1
was #797

Analysis

Activity Inputs

45.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
12.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026
Signed Commits
77%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 9
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Ris MCP Ts

Public trust evidence for Ris MCP Ts is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Ris MCP Ts publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Ris MCP Ts. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Ris MCP Ts have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Ris MCP Ts has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Ris MCP Ts actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 18 days ago.
What license does Ris MCP Ts use?
Ris MCP Ts ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Ris MCP Ts's commits signed?
77% of the last 100 commits to Ris MCP Ts are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Ris MCP Ts appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Ris MCP Ts's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Ris MCP Ts?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Ris MCP Ts from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 22Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 2Score 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 283 spots (#506 → #789)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 14.2pts (40.6 → 54.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #506
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 60 spots (#830 → #770)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#826 → #836)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#815 → #825)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#800 → #815)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#792 → #804)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 34 spots (#826 → #792)
2026-09-08
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (40 → 47)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#788 → #826)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#755 → #788)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 142 spots (#613 → #755)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 58 spots (#671 → #613)
2026-09-04
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 5pts (41 → 46)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#599 → #671)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#566 → #599)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#515 → #566)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#481 → #515)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 567 spots (#1045 → #478)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 32.9pts (23.5 → 56.4)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#1013 → #1045)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#993 → #1013)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 102 spots (#891 → #993)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#893 → #882)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#875 → #893)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#822 → #873)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #812

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 54.6 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ris-mcp-ts.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ris-mcp-ts)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ris-mcp-ts"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ris-mcp-ts.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON