DexPaprika

DexPaprika MCP server for real-time crypto token data, DEX trading activity, and DeFi analytics across multiple blockcha

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade C Listed MIT
51.1/100
Rank #867 of 1328
Compare DexPaprika

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-04 · 4d ago
Recent change
Rank +7

Is DexPaprika safe? DexPaprika scores 51.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #867 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 58% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#853 → #867)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#813 → #853)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 77 spots (#736 → #813)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
52.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#486

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 14:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
42
Forks
17
Last Push
2026-09-04
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
9?
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼14
was #853

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

51.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

DexPaprika MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.0 / 25
0.9 below avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.7 / 17
0.7 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.7 / 20
1.5 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.9 / 20
3.0 below avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

52.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
12.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 1, 2026
Signed Commits
58%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 10

Is DexPaprika safe?

Public trust evidence for DexPaprika is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does DexPaprika publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for DexPaprika. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does DexPaprika have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
DexPaprika has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is DexPaprika actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does DexPaprika use?
DexPaprika ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are DexPaprika's commits signed?
57% of the last 100 commits to DexPaprika are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
DexPaprika appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain DexPaprika?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores DexPaprika from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 17Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#853 → #867)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#813 → #853)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 77 spots (#736 → #813)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 68 spots (#668 → #736)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#637 → #668)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#601 → #637)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#571 → #601)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#550 → #571)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#518 → #550)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.9/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 542 spots (#1061 → #519)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 31.3pts (23.2 → 54.5)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#1025 → #1061)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#998 → #1025)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 99 spots (#899 → #998)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#881 → #901)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#904 → #884)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#905 → #895)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 56 spots (#841 → #897)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #835

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 51.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/dexpaprika.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/dexpaprika)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/dexpaprika"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/dexpaprika.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON