Obsidian Local REST API
A secure REST API and Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for your vault.
Is Obsidian Local REST API safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Obsidian Local REST API
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Obsidian Local REST API scores 56.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #728 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 37% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Obsidian Local REST API compares in MCP Servers
- #401 MaverickMCP 56.8 +0.1
- #402 Oxylabs MCP 56.8 +0.1
- #403 Obsidian Local REST API 56.7 this agent
- #404 Kibana 56.6 −0.1
- #405 FreeCAD MCP 56.5 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Obsidian Local REST API’s 56.7.
Where the 56.7 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
56.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceObsidian Local REST API MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
73.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Obsidian Local REST API
Does Obsidian Local REST API publish package provenance?
Does Obsidian Local REST API have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Obsidian Local REST API actively maintained?
What license does Obsidian Local REST API use?
Are Obsidian Local REST API's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Obsidian Local REST API's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Obsidian Local REST API?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Obsidian Local REST API from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/obsidian-local-rest-api)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/obsidian-local-rest-api"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/obsidian-local-rest-api.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON