Redmine MCP Server

jztan/redmine-mcp-server

MCP server connecting AI assistants to Redmine: issues, projects, wikis, time tracking, agile boards, and CRM, with OAut

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed MIT

37.3/100

Rank #665 of 1283

Compare Redmine MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-10 · 2d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is Redmine MCP Server safe? Redmine MCP Server scores 37.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #665 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 28% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#286 Oxylabs MCP — 37.5 (D) → #287 MCP Klever Vm — 37.3 (D) → #289 Yahoo Finance — 37.0 (D) → #290 Pdf MCP — 37.0 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#634 → #663)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #634

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Redmine MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

67.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#288

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-10

2 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

106

Downloads (7d)

448

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #666

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

37.3 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Redmine MCP Server MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

1.4 / 25

3.6 below avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

7.5 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.9 / 20

2.1 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

67.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

10.9 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

6.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

28%

of last 100 commits verified

Is Redmine MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for Redmine MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Redmine MCP Server publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Redmine MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Redmine MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Redmine MCP Server. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is Redmine MCP Server actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).

What license does Redmine MCP Server use?

Redmine MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Redmine MCP Server's commits signed?

28% of the last 100 commits to Redmine MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Redmine MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Redmine MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Redmine MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#634 → #663)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #634

GitHub → PyPI: redmine-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/redmine-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/redmine-mcp-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/redmine-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/redmine-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON