Podman MCP Server

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for container runtimes (Podman and Docker)

MCP Servers Go Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
72.9/100
Rank #182 of 1320
Compare Podman MCP Server

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-21 · 14d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is Podman MCP Server safe? Podman MCP Server scores 72.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #182 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.0/10; 91% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-21. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#163 → #177)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#133 → #154)
2026-08-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
48.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#91

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 14 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
82
Forks
18
Last Push
2026-08-21
14 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
3
Downloads (7d)
21
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
13
Rank Change
▼5
was #177

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

72.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Podman MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
17.1 / 25
7.5 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.9 / 17
in line with avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.5 / 20
1.3 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.4 / 20
in line with avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

48.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
11.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
7.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026
Signed Commits
91%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 6
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Podman MCP Server safe?

Podman MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Podman MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Podman MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Podman MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Podman MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Podman MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.
What license does Podman MCP Server use?
Podman MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Podman MCP Server's commits signed?
91% of the last 100 commits to Podman MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Podman MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Podman MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Podman MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 13Score 2Listed 1Grade 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#163 → #177)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#133 → #154)
2026-08-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 129 spots (#256 → #127)
2026-08-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.4pts (65.0 → 73.4)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#237 → #256)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#220 → #237)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#235 → #220)
2026-08-21
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#225 → #240)
2026-08-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 41 spots (#266 → #225)
2026-08-18
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 6pts (42 → 48)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 37 spots (#303 → #266)
2026-08-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#292 → #305)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#275 → #295)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#261 → #275)
2026-08-12
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 8pts (49 → 41)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#243 → #259)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #239

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 72.9 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/podman-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/podman-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/podman-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/podman-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON