updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

Prism MCP

Repository

An MCP server for interacting with Prismatic dev tools.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Prism MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 33%
Last push yesterday
Advisories None known
Compare Prism MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Prism MCP scores 72.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #324 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; 33% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@prismatic-io/prism-mcp); last pushed 2026-11-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Prism MCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Prism MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/prismatic-io/prism-mcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-09. 33% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.2/10 (scanned Nov 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review8
    • Branch Protection5
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 5
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 8
    Contributors 6
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 9
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked and attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @prismatic-io/prism-mcp 1.5.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-09).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-09-03 OSSF Scorecard: 5.1/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Prism MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Prism MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #190 Hunch MCP 72.5 +0.1
  2. #191 iCloud MCP 72.5 +0.1
  3. #192 Prism MCP 72.4 this agent
  4. #193 OpenClaw MCP Server 72.3 −0.1
  5. #194 MCP Fiscal Brasil 72.1 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Prism MCP’s 72.4.

Where the 72.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

72.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Prism MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
15.7 / 25
4.9 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.9 / 17
0.6 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
14.0 / 20
1.8 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.8 / 20
0.8 below avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-11-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#351 → #323)
2026-10-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#358 → #347)
2026-10-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#369 → #358)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
48.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#192
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
27
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-11-09
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
10?
Downloads (7d)
318
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲2
was #326

Analysis

Activity Inputs

48.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
13.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Common questions about Prism MCP

Prism MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Prism MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Prism MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Prism MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Prism MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Prism MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Prism MCP use?
Prism MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Prism MCP's commits signed?
33% of the last 100 commits to Prism MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Prism MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Prism MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Prism MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Prism MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21HVTrust 2Grade 2Score 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1
2026-11-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#351 → #323)
2026-10-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#358 → #347)
2026-10-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#369 → #358)
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#347 → #358)
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#360 → #342)
2026-10-15
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 8pts (35 → 43)
2026-10-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#341 → #366)
2026-10-10
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (40 → 34)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#331 → #341)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 623 spots (#938 → #315)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 44.6pts (26.1 → 70.7)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #938
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#305 → #318)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 59 spots (#203 → #262)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#191 → #203)
2026-09-03
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.1/10
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 749 spots (#940 → #191)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.7pts (41.7 → 71.4)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 53 spots (#887 → #940)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#852 → #887)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#827 → #852)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#795 → #827)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#747 → #795)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#724 → #747)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#700 → #724)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 101 spots (#599 → #700)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#593 → #604)
GitHub → npm: @prismatic-io/prism-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 72.4 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/prism-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/prism-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/prism-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/prism-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON