Is Power Bi Agentic Development safe to use?

Power Bi Agentic Development has an HVTrust score of 53.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #189 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Power Bi Agentic Development?

Power Bi Agentic Development scores 53.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 941 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Power Bi Agentic Development

data-goblin/power-bi-agentic-development

Power BI AI skills and Power BI agents for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot: a plugin marketplace of Power BI skills, subagents, and hooks for semantic models, DAX, TMDL, reports, and AI dashboards. Includes Microsoft Fabric skills and Fabric agents. Weekly updates.

Agent Skills C# Listed GPL-3.0

Is Power Bi Agentic Development safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 5%

Last push 3d ago

Compare Power Bi Agentic Development

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Power Bi Agentic Development scores 53.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #189 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.0/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Power Bi Agentic Development compares in Agent Skills

#187 Callstackincubator Agent Skills 53.3 ±0
#188 Claude Code Skills Zh 53.3 ±0
#189 Power Bi Agentic Development 53.3 this agent
#190 Video Shotcraft 53.3 ±0
#191 Nagisanzenin Engram 53.2 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Power Bi Agentic Development’s 53.3.

Where the 53.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

53.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Power Bi Agentic Development Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.3 / 25

2.8 below avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.9 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.5 / 20

2.3 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.1 / 20

1.9 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#172 → #188)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Power Bi Agentic Development View Agent Skills Report missing data

67.2

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#189

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

941

Forks

139

Last Push

2026-09-23

3 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #188

Analysis

Activity Inputs

67.2 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

14.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

10.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 6

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Power Bi Agentic Development

Public trust evidence for Power Bi Agentic Development is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Power Bi Agentic Development publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Power Bi Agentic Development. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Power Bi Agentic Development have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Power Bi Agentic Development has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Power Bi Agentic Development actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).

What license does Power Bi Agentic Development use?

Power Bi Agentic Development ships under GPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Power Bi Agentic Development's commits signed?

5% of the last 100 commits to Power Bi Agentic Development are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Power Bi Agentic Development appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Power Bi Agentic Development's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Power Bi Agentic Development?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Power Bi Agentic Development from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#172 → #188)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 44 spots (#127 → #171)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.4pts (42.1 → 53.5)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #127

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-19

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-18

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#206 → #221)

2026-09-17

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 56 spots (#262 → #206)

2026-09-17

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.7pts (45.2 → 50.9)

2026-09-17

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 15pts (47 → 62)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#238 → #248)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#192 → #217)

2026-09-07

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 9pts (57 → 48)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#177 → #189)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#153 → #164)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#140 → #153)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#125 → #140)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#101 → #125)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#80 → #101)

2026-08-28

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#62 → #80)

2026-08-27

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.7/10

2026-08-27

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank rose 130 spots (#192 → #62)

2026-08-27

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 27.9pts (22.2 → 50.1)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 93 spots (#99 → #192)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#76 → #86)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #70

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/power-bi-agentic-development.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/power-bi-agentic-development)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/power-bi-agentic-development"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/power-bi-agentic-development.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON