updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

Claude Codex Settings

Repository Website by fcakyon

Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.

Agent Skills Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is Claude Codex Settings safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 60%
Last push yesterday
Compare Claude Codex Settings

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Claude Codex Settings scores 56.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #162 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.3/10; 60% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Claude Codex Settings could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Claude Codex Settings and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-11-09. 60% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.3/10 (scanned Nov 4, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies3
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 6
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 3
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Claude Codex Settings is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-05 OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Claude Codex Settings’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Claude Codex Settings compares in Agent Skills

  1. #160 Power Bi Agentic Development 56.2 +0.1
  2. #161 Novel To Game 56.1 ±0
  3. #162 Claude Codex Settings 56.1 this agent
  4. #163 Baoyu Design 55.9 −0.2
  5. #164 Evolver 55.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Claude Codex Settings’s 56.1.

Where the 56.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

56.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Claude Codex Settings Agent Skills average (384 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.1 / 25
1.1 below avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.3 / 17
0.9 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.1 / 20
5.1 above avg 14.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.4 / 20
1.7 below avg 9.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-05
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini
2026-11-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#193 → #175)
2026-10-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#208 → #191)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent
View Agent Skills Report missing data
75.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#162
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.2k
Forks
113
Last Push
2026-11-09
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
63
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
6
Rank Change
▼1
was #161

Analysis

Activity Inputs

75.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
22.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.6 / 20

Common questions about Claude Codex Settings

Claude Codex Settings has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Claude Codex Settings publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Claude Codex Settings. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Claude Codex Settings have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Claude Codex Settings has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Claude Codex Settings actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Claude Codex Settings use?
Claude Codex Settings ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Claude Codex Settings's commits signed?
60% of the last 100 commits to Claude Codex Settings are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Claude Codex Settings appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Claude Codex Settings's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-11-05
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Claude Codex Settings?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Claude Codex Settings from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 3Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-11-05
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini
2026-11-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#193 → #175)
2026-10-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#208 → #191)
2026-10-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#222 → #210)
2026-10-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#234 → #223)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 77 spots (#157 → #234)
2026-10-12
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 4.8pts (55.6 → 50.8)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 45 spots (#205 → #160)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#194 → #205)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#133 → #145)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#122 → #134)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.8pts (42.3 → 56.1)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #122
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#121 → #137)
2026-09-05
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 203 spots (#297 → #94)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 32.8pts (24.8 → 57.6)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#276 → #289)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#264 → #276)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#252 → #264)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#234 → #252)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#200 → #234)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#171 → #200)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#144 → #171)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#128 → #144)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#56 → #128)
GitHub → Website →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 56.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-codex-settings.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-codex-settings)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-codex-settings"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-codex-settings.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON