Is Novel To Game safe to use?

Novel To Game has an HVTrust score of 52.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #195 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Novel To Game?

Novel To Game scores 52.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 801 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Novel To Game

worldwonderer/novel-to-game

Agent skills for source-grounded novel-to-game adaptation (小说改编游戏 / story to game): cited design docs, target-runtime builds, evidence-based QA. Three playable browser examples. For Claude Code, Codex, and Kimi Code.

Agent Skills Markdown Listed MIT

Is Novel To Game safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 4%

Last push 5d ago

Compare Novel To Game

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Novel To Game scores 52.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #195 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-21. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Novel To Game compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Novel To Game’s 52.8.

Where the 52.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

52.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Novel To Game Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.9 / 25

2.2 below avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.4 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.0 / 20

2.8 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.0 / 20

2.0 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#175 → #195)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Novel To Game View Agent Skills Report missing data

68.1

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#195

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

801

Forks

113

Last Push

2026-09-21

5 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #195

Analysis

Activity Inputs

68.1 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.3 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

16.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

9.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 1

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Novel To Game

Public trust evidence for Novel To Game is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Novel To Game publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Novel To Game. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Novel To Game have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Novel To Game has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Novel To Game actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 5 day(s).

What license does Novel To Game use?

Novel To Game ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Novel To Game's commits signed?

4% of the last 100 commits to Novel To Game are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Novel To Game's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain Novel To Game?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Novel To Game from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#175 → #195)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 94 spots (#80 → #174)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.0pts (45.2 → 53.2)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #80

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#112 → #125)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#125 → #112)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#115 → #125)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#105 → #115)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#87 → #105)

2026-08-30

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10

2026-08-30

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 148 spots (#235 → #87)

2026-08-30

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 31.7pts (22.8 → 54.5)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#203 → #235)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#190 → #203)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#171 → #190)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 80 spots (#91 → #171)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #84

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/novel-to-game.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/novel-to-game)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/novel-to-game"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/novel-to-game.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON