PentAGI
Fully autonomous AI Agents system capable of performing complex penetration testing tasks
Is PentAGI safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare PentAGI
How does it stack up against its Security & Guardrails neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: PentAGI scores 56.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #747 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.6/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How PentAGI compares in Security & Guardrails
- #12 Garak 56.2 +0.1
- #13 PentestAgent 56.1 ±0
- #14 PentAGI 56.1 this agent
- #15 Agentic Security 55.9 −0.2
- #16 CyberStrike 55.2 −0.9
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks PentAGI’s 56.1.
Where the 56.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Security & Guardrails average
56.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidencePentAGI Security & Guardrails average (22 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
67.4 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about PentAGI
Does PentAGI publish package provenance?
Does PentAGI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is PentAGI actively maintained?
What license does PentAGI use?
Are PentAGI's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain PentAGI?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores PentAGI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentagi)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentagi"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentagi.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Security & Guardrails
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON