PentAGI

Fully autonomous AI Agents system capable of performing complex penetration testing tasks

Security & Guardrails Go Grade C Listed MIT
63.8/100
Rank #258 of 1283
Compare PentAGI

How does it stack up against its Security & Guardrails neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-06 · 6d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is PentAGI safe? PentAGI scores 63.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #258 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-06. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Security & Guardrails

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#237 → #254)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#186 → #231)
2026-08-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 27 spots (#211 → #184)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
91.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#6

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 6 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
21.8k
Forks
2.9k
Last Push
2026-08-06
6 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
201
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
38
Rank Change
▼3
was #255

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Security & Guardrails

63.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

PentAGI Security & Guardrails average (19 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.0 / 25
3.7 above avg 8.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.1 below avg 11.9
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.3 / 17
1.6 above avg 11.7
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.6 / 20
3.3 above avg 16.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.4 / 20
in line with avg 10.0

Activity Inputs

91.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.2 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 7
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 3
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 2
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 7
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 0

Is PentAGI safe?

PentAGI has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does PentAGI publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for PentAGI. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does PentAGI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
PentAGI has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is PentAGI actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).
What license does PentAGI use?
PentAGI ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are PentAGI's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to PentAGI are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare PentAGI head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
PentAGI appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
7 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain PentAGI?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores PentAGI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 8Score 2HVTrust 2Listed 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#237 → #254)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#186 → #231)
2026-08-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 27 spots (#211 → #184)
2026-08-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 84 spots (#295 → #211)
2026-08-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.1pts (52.6 → 60.7)
2026-08-03
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 25pts (67 → 92)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#262 → #280)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#250 → #262)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#221 → #250)
2026-06-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#181 → #205)
2026-06-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.1pts (59.4 → 56.3)
2026-06-30
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 10pts (75 → 66)
2026-06-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #165

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 63.8 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentagi.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentagi)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentagi"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentagi.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Security & Guardrails

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON