PentAGI

Fully autonomous AI Agents system capable of performing complex penetration testing tasks

Security & Guardrails Go Grade C Listed MIT
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
61.1/100 · Grade C
Last push
2026-06-23 · 1d ago
Recent change
New

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
61.1/100 · Grade C
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
16.5/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
11.0/25
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-06-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #165
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
80.5
Activity Score · out of 100
61.1
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#165
Global Rank · of 317
#4

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-06-24 18:00 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Activity & Reach

Stars
17.9k
Forks
2.4k
Last Push
2026-06-23
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
13
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
32
Rank Change
NEW

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

61.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
11.0 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
12.6 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
16.5 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
10.2 / 20

Activity Inputs

80.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
14.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jun 24, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 8
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 7
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is PentAGI safe?

PentAGI has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does PentAGI publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for PentAGI. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does PentAGI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
PentAGI has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is PentAGI actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does PentAGI use?
PentAGI ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are PentAGI's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to PentAGI are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

Profile context only

HVTrust currently ranks supply-chain and project-integrity trust only. This public view shows a compact AI-agent surface snapshot from repo docs and manifests. These fields are descriptive context and do not affect the production HVTrust rank. An experimental local preview remains available in Score Lab →, and the policy boundary is tracked on the roadmap →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
PentAGI appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
7 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Anthropic
  • Google Gemini
  • OpenAI
  • Postgres
  • Redis
  • Tavily
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
  • code
  • database
  • filesystem
  • search
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain PentAGI?

HVTrust scores PentAGI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1
2026-06-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #165

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 61.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentagi.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentagi)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentagi"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentagi.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Security & Guardrails

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.2 · Raw JSON