SkillSpector

Security scanner for AI agent skills. Detect vulnerabilities, malicious patterns, security risks, prompt injection, data exfiltration, and supply-chain risks in Claude Code, Codex, and MCP skills before you install them.

Security & Guardrails Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is SkillSpector safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 77%
Last push today
Compare SkillSpector

How does it stack up against its Security & Guardrails neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: SkillSpector scores 62.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #604 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.1/10; 77% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How SkillSpector could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships SkillSpector and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/NVIDIA/SkillSpector, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-10-13. 77% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.1/10 (scanned Oct 12, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review10
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies8
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 10
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 8
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. SkillSpector is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of SkillSpector.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues SkillSpector’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How SkillSpector compares in Security & Guardrails

  1. #7 Garak 65.6 +3.1
  2. #8 Snyk Agent Scan 63.5 +1.0
  3. #9 SkillSpector 62.5 this agent
  4. #10 Deepsec 57.5 −5.0
  5. #11 PentAGI 55.9 −6.6

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks SkillSpector’s 62.5.

Where the 62.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Security & Guardrails average

62.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

SkillSpector Security & Guardrails average (26 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.2 / 25
in line with avg 10.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.4 below avg 12.2
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
in line with avg 12.6
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.1 above avg 14.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.3 / 20
in line with avg 10.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#539 → #604)
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#527 → #539)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 49 spots (#568 → #519)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
90.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#9

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-13 08:09 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-13

Activity & Reach

Stars
20.1k
Forks
1.8k
Last Push
2026-10-13
today
Commits (4 wk)
721
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
63
Rank Change
=
was #604

Analysis

Activity Inputs

90.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.1 / 20

Common questions about SkillSpector

SkillSpector has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does SkillSpector publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for SkillSpector. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does SkillSpector have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
SkillSpector has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is SkillSpector actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does SkillSpector use?
SkillSpector ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are SkillSpector's commits signed?
77% of the last 100 commits to SkillSpector are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
SkillSpector appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
5 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to SkillSpector's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Azure OpenAI

Maintain SkillSpector?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores SkillSpector from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 35Grade 3Surface 2
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#539 → #604)
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#527 → #539)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 49 spots (#568 → #519)
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 39 spots (#607 → #568)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#560 → #607)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#547 → #557)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#536 → #547)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#504 → #531)
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 34 spots (#529 → #495)
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#494 → #525)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 277 spots (#217 → #494)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 324 spots (#540 → #216)
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#525 → #540)
2026-09-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Azure OpenAI
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#487 → #519)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#481 → #492)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#471 → #481)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#458 → #472)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#426 → #458)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#352 → #417)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#340 → #352)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 34 spots (#374 → #340)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#363 → #374)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#348 → #363)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#333 → #348)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#332 → #342)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#303 → #329)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#292 → #310)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#309 → #294)
2026-08-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#282 → #309)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#261 → #286)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#279 → #261)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#252 → #270)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#270 → #252)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#250 → #271)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 53 spots (#191 → #244)
2026-08-06
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-08-04
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-07-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.5 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/skillspector.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/skillspector)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/skillspector"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/skillspector.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Security & Guardrails

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON