Is Agentic Security safe to use?

Agentic Security has an HVTrust score of 49.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #315 of 468 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Agentic Security?

Agentic Security scores 49.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 2.0k GitHub stars and is categorized under Security & Guardrails.

Agentic Security

msoedov/agentic_security

Agentic LLM Vulnerability Scanner / AI red teaming kit 🧪

Security & Guardrails Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0

49.8/100

Rank #315 of 468

Compare Agentic Security

How does it stack up against its Security & Guardrails neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-31 · 6d ago

Recent change

Grade Changed +4

Is Agentic Security safe? Agentic Security scores 49.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #315 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; 20% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-31. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Security & Guardrails

#9 LLM Guard — 56.5 (C) → #10 Llama Guard — 51.7 (C) → #12 HexStrike AI — 46.1 (D) → #13 T3MP3ST — 24.9 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-07-31

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-31

Rank Moved

Rank rose 26 spots (#339 → #313)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Agentic Security View Security & Guardrails Report missing data

59.1

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#11

In Security & Guardrails

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars

2.0k

Forks

271

Last Push

2026-07-31

6 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #314

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Security & Guardrails

49.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agentic Security Security & Guardrails average (14 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.5 / 25

1.5 below avg 9.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.5 below avg 11.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.9 / 17

in line with avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

12.8 / 20

3.8 below avg 16.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.9 / 20

2.8 below avg 10.7

Activity Inputs

59.1 / 100

StarsRepository reach

19.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.2 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

3.8 / 25

CommunityFork signal

11.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

5.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 5, 2026

Signed Commits

20%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 8

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 5

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 4

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Agentic Security safe?

Public trust evidence for Agentic Security is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Agentic Security publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Agentic Security. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Agentic Security have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Agentic Security has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Agentic Security actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).

What license does Agentic Security use?

Agentic Security ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Agentic Security's commits signed?

20% of the last 100 commits to Agentic Security are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

code

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Agentic Security?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agentic Security from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-07-31

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-31

Rank Moved

Rank rose 26 spots (#339 → #313)

2026-07-31

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.7pts (46.5 → 50.2)

2026-07-31

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 9pts (51 → 60)

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#328 → #338)

2026-07-23

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 6pts (58 → 52)

2026-07-15

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#271 → #302)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#257 → #271)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#228 → #257)

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#170 → #194)

2026-06-23

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.2/10

2026-06-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 104 spots (#274 → #170)

2026-06-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 34.9pts (22.7 → 57.6)

2026-06-21

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#252 → #271)

2026-06-20

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #252

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentic-security.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentic-security)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentic-security"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentic-security.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Security & Guardrails

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON