Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs PentAGI

DvalinCode vs PentAGI

DvalinCode leads on trust: 83.7/100 (Grade A) against 54.9/100 (Grade C), a 28.8-point gap. DvalinCode leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence; PentAGI leads on adoption.

A DvalinCode 83.7

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #121 overall · #4 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose DvalinCode if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+8.0Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 5.5
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.6Maintenance
+1.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 5.5

C PentAGI 54.9

Fully autonomous AI Agents system capable of performing complex penetration testing tasks

vxcontrol/pentagi · #862 overall · #17 Security & Guardrails · coverage C (2/5)

Choose PentAGI if adoption matters most.

+2.5Adoption: 34.2k GitHub stars against 121

Where they differ

19.8

Safety / IntegrityDvalinCode +8.0

11.8

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceDvalinCode +7.2

10.8

14.2

TransparencyDvalinCode +1.0

13.2

19.1

MaintenanceDvalinCode +6.6

12.5

8.4

AdoptionPentAGI +2.5

10.9

+4.2

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +8.5

-4.3

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and PentAGI, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	PentAGIvxcontrol/pentagi
HVTrust score	83.7	54.9
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#121	#862
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#4	#17
GitHub stars	121	34.2k
Last updated	2d ago	2d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.7 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	331/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.8	11.8
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.2	13.2
Maintenance / 20	19.1	12.5
Adoption / 20	8.4	10.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	2 — Anthropic, Tavily	9 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Firecrawl, …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile PentAGI profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →