Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs PentAGI

DvalinCode vs PentAGI

DvalinCode leads on trust: 85.0/100 (Grade A) against 57.5/100 (Grade C), a 27.5-point gap. DvalinCode leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence; PentAGI leads on adoption.

A DvalinCode 85.0

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #86 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose DvalinCode if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+8.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 5.6
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.3Maintenance
+1.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 5.6

C PentAGI 57.5

Fully autonomous AI Agents system capable of performing complex penetration testing tasks

vxcontrol/pentagi · #710 overall · #8 Security & Guardrails · coverage C (2/5)

Choose PentAGI if adoption matters most.

+2.1Adoption: 25.1k GitHub stars against 120

Where they differ

20.2

Safety / IntegrityDvalinCode +8.3

11.9

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceDvalinCode +7.2

10.8

14.3

TransparencyDvalinCode +1.0

13.3

19.5

MaintenanceDvalinCode +6.3

13.2

8.5

AdoptionPentAGI +2.1

10.6

+4.5

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +6.8

-2.3

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and PentAGI, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	PentAGIvxcontrol/pentagi
HVTrust score	85.0	57.5
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#86	#710
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#2	#8
GitHub stars	120	25.1k
Last updated	2d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.8 / 10	5.6 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	401/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.2	11.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.3	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.5	13.2
Adoption / 20	8.5	10.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	7 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Firecrawl, …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile PentAGI profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →