updated 2026-08-06 05:00 UTC

OpenLIT

openlit/openlit

Open source platform for AI Engineering: OpenTelemetry-native LLM Observability, GPU Monitoring, Guardrails, Evaluations

Observability & Evaluation TypeScript Grade C Listed Apache-2.0
58.5/100
Rank #235 of 468
Compare OpenLIT

How does it stack up against its Observability & Evaluation neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-03 · 3d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is OpenLIT safe? OpenLIT scores 58.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #235 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Observability & Evaluation

#13 Helicone — 60.1 (C) → #14 Traceroot — 58.9 (C) → #16 AgentOps — 58.1 (C) → #17 Opik — 46.5 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#204 → #220)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#184 → #199)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#171 → #184)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for OpenLIT View Observability & Evaluation Report missing data
80.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#15
In Observability & Evaluation

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-06 05:00 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.7k
Forks
344
Last Push
2026-08-03
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
74
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
23
Rank Change
▼2
was #233

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Observability & Evaluation

58.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

OpenLIT Observability & Evaluation average (21 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.8 / 25
in line with avg 11.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.4 below avg 13.2
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.2 / 17
1.3 above avg 11.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.3 / 20
4.2 above avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.2 / 20
6.4 below avg 14.6

Activity Inputs

80.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.4 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 5, 2026
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 4
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 3
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is OpenLIT safe?

OpenLIT has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does OpenLIT publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for OpenLIT. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does OpenLIT have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
OpenLIT has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is OpenLIT actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does OpenLIT use?
OpenLIT ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are OpenLIT's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to OpenLIT are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
7 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
  • code
  • database
  • search
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain OpenLIT?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores OpenLIT from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 5Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-07-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#204 → #220)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#184 → #199)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#171 → #184)
2026-06-23
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.7/10
2026-06-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 123 spots (#263 → #140)
2026-06-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 37.4pts (25.3 → 62.7)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#243 → #259)
2026-06-20
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #243
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 58.5 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/openlit.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/openlit)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/openlit"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/openlit.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Observability & Evaluation

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON