LangWatch

The platform for LLM evaluations and AI agent testing

Observability & Evaluation TypeScript Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
75.7/100
Rank #92 of 1308
Compare LangWatch

How does it stack up against its Observability & Evaluation neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-25 · 0d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is LangWatch safe? LangWatch scores 75.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #92 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 89% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Observability & Evaluation

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
83.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#7

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-25 08:32 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.5k
Forks
352
Last Push
2026-08-25
today
Commits (4 wk)
693
Downloads (7d)
88,342
npm+pypi
HN mentions (30d)
1
Open Issues
652
Rank Change
=
was #92

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Observability & Evaluation

75.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

LangWatch Observability & Evaluation average (23 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.9 / 25
1.0 above avg 10.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
5.0 above avg 13.0
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.4 below avg 11.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.1 above avg 14.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
15.1 / 20
1.1 above avg 14.0

Activity Inputs

83.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
89%
of last 100 commits verified

Is LangWatch safe?

Public supply-chain signals for LangWatch are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but LangWatch carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does LangWatch publish package provenance?
Yes. LangWatch's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does LangWatch have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for LangWatch. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is LangWatch actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does LangWatch use?
LangWatch ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are LangWatch's commits signed?
89% of the last 100 commits to LangWatch are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare LangWatch head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
LangWatch appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
medium confidence
Partial
Some package metadata matches; some source metadata is missing
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to LangWatch's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-05
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain LangWatch?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores LangWatch from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
HVTrust 6Rank 6Grade 5Scorecard 3Scorecard 2Score 1Provenance 1
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#67 → #77)
2026-06-16
Scorecard Removed
OSSF Scorecard no longer detected
2026-06-16
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-06-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#33 → #63)
2026-06-16
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 9.8pts (83.1 → 73.3)
2026-06-15
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-06-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-06-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 28 spots (#61 → #33)
2026-06-15
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (73.1 → 83.1)
2026-06-13
Scorecard Removed
OSSF Scorecard no longer detected
2026-06-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-06-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#33 → #65)
2026-06-13
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 10.3pts (83.3 → 73.0)
2026-06-11
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-06-11
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-06-11
Rank Moved
Rank rose 30 spots (#63 → #33)
2026-06-11
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.3pts (73.1 → 83.4)
2026-06-10
Scorecard Removed
OSSF Scorecard no longer detected
2026-06-10
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-06-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#29 → #63)
2026-06-10
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 10.4pts (83.5 → 73.1)
2026-06-05
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.9pts (57.9 → 67.8)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 25pts (58 → 83)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 75.7 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/langwatch.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/langwatch)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/langwatch"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/langwatch.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Observability & Evaluation

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON