AgentOps

Python SDK for AI agent monitoring, LLM cost tracking, benchmarking, and more. Integrates with most LLMs and agent frame

Observability & Evaluation Python Grade C Listed MIT
57.0/100
Rank #384 of 1308
Compare AgentOps

How does it stack up against its Observability & Evaluation neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-06-25 · 61d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is AgentOps safe? AgentOps scores 57.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #384 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Observability & Evaluation

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#365 → #383)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#382 → #366)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#367 → #382)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 61 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
52.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#16

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-25 11:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 61 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.8k
Forks
615
Last Push
2026-06-25
61 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
56,077
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
40
Open Issues
111
Rank Change
▼1
was #383

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Observability & Evaluation

57.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AgentOps Observability & Evaluation average (23 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.4 / 25
1.5 below avg 10.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.2 below avg 13.0
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.5 / 17
in line with avg 11.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
7.9 / 20
7.0 below avg 14.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
15.4 / 20
1.4 above avg 14.0

Activity Inputs

52.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
16.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jun 22, 2026 (refresh pending)
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 10

Is AgentOps safe?

AgentOps has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does AgentOps publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AgentOps. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AgentOps have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AgentOps has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AgentOps actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 61 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does AgentOps use?
AgentOps ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AgentOps's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to AgentOps are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AgentOps's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-07-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Mistral AI
2026-06-25
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-06-17
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain AgentOps?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AgentOps from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 5Stale 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Score 1Fresh 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#365 → #383)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#382 → #366)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#367 → #382)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#384 → #368)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#374 → #384)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 48 spots (#419 → #371)
2026-08-13
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.9pts (52.9 → 57.8)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#372 → #419)
2026-08-12
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 4.8pts (57.7 → 52.9)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#352 → #371)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 85 spots (#260 → #345)
2026-07-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#222 → #233)
2026-07-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#210 → #220)
2026-07-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Mistral AI
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#162 → #187)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#150 → #162)
2026-06-25
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-06-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 41 spots (#221 → #180)
2026-06-25
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.1pts (52.7 → 59.8)
2026-06-25
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 17pts (47 → 64)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#194 → #221)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#181 → #194)
2026-06-22
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-06-22
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-06-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 55 spots (#236 → #181)
2026-06-22
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.8pts (34.1 → 52.9)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#221 → #236)
2026-06-17
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#168 → #186)
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#148 → #168)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.5pts (24.8 → 32.3)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 57.0 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentops.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentops)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentops"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentops.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Observability & Evaluation

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON