updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Opengap

open-gitagent/opengap

A framework-agnostic, git-native standard for defining AI agents

Agent Skills TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
30.8/100
Rank #27 of 148
Compare Opengap

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-02 · 41d ago
Recent change
New

Is Opengap safe? Opengap scores 30.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #27 of 148 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 33% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Skills

#25 Qiushi Skill — 32.5 (D) → #26 Visual Explainer — 31.0 (D) → #28 Prd Taskmaster — 30.8 (D) → #29 HelloAgents — 29.4 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #28
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 41 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Opengap View Agent Skills Report missing data
52.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#27
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 41 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.9k
Forks
342
Last Push
2026-07-02
41 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
19
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
9
Rank Change
▲1
was #28

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Skills

30.8 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Opengap Agent Skills average (148 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.6 / 25
1.1 below avg 2.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.5 below avg 11.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.3 / 20
5.8 below avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.0 / 20
0.8 above avg 9.2

Activity Inputs

52.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
19.3 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
33%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Opengap safe?

Public trust evidence for Opengap is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Opengap publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Opengap. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Opengap have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Opengap. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Opengap actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 41 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Opengap use?
Opengap ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Opengap's commits signed?
32% of the last 100 commits to Opengap are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Opengap?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Opengap from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #28
GitHub → npm: @open-gitagent/opengap

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 30.8 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/opengap.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/opengap)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/opengap"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/opengap.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON