updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

Opengap

Repository Website

A framework-agnostic, git-native standard for defining AI agents

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Opengap safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 33%
Last push 131d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Opengap

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Opengap scores 46.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #308 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.3/10; 33% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@open-gitagent/opengap); last pushed 2026-07-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Opengap could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Opengap and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/open-gitagent/opengap, MIT, last pushed 2026-07-02. 33% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.3/10 (scanned Oct 24, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review2
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies3
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 4
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 2
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 3
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @open-gitagent/opengap 0.5.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-01 OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Opengap’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Opengap compares in Agent Skills

  1. #306 Qiaomu Cut Skill 46.7 +0.4
  2. #307 Jezweb Claude Skills 46.6 +0.3
  3. #308 Opengap 46.3 this agent
  4. #309 Skill Flow 46.2 −0.1
  5. #310 Autoprompt Skill 46.1 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Opengap’s 46.3.

Where the 46.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

46.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Opengap Agent Skills average (384 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.8 / 25
2.4 below avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.3 / 17
0.9 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
3.3 / 20
10.7 below avg 14.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.1 / 20
2.0 above avg 9.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#316 → #304)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#302 → #313)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 131 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent
View Agent Skills Report missing data
39.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#308
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 131 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.0k
Forks
354
Last Push
2026-07-02
131 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
107
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
16
Rank Change
=
was #308

Analysis

Activity Inputs

39.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
6.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.9 / 20

Common questions about Opengap

Public trust evidence for Opengap is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Opengap publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Opengap. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Opengap have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Opengap has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Opengap actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 131 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Opengap use?
Opengap ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Opengap's commits signed?
32% of the last 100 commits to Opengap are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Opengap's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-30
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

Maintain Opengap?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Opengap from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 15HVTrust 4Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Stale 1
2026-11-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#316 → #304)
2026-10-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#302 → #313)
2026-09-30
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#230 → #253)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 99 spots (#330 → #231)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.0pts (21.8 → 48.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #330
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#200 → #212)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 91 spots (#270 → #179)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 16.5pts (33.4 → 49.9)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 112 spots (#151 → #263)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 16.7pts (50.3 → 33.6)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#141 → #151)
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-09-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 95 spots (#236 → #141)
2026-09-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 20.3pts (30.0 → 50.3)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#216 → #236)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#179 → #216)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#139 → #179)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#114 → #139)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#92 → #114)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 60 spots (#32 → #92)
GitHub → Website → npm: @open-gitagent/opengap

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 46.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/opengap.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/opengap)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/opengap"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/opengap.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON