Qiaomu Cut Skill

乔木智能视频导演 Skill:素材治理、双语字幕、品牌包装与可复现渲染 | Agent-native video director with governed sourcing and verifiable rendering

Agent Skills JavaScript Listed MIT

Is Qiaomu Cut Skill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 100%
Last push 2d ago
Compare Qiaomu Cut Skill
Suggest a correction

In detail: Qiaomu Cut Skill scores 48.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #274 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.7/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Qiaomu Cut Skill could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Qiaomu Cut Skill and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/joeseesun/qiaomu-cut-skill, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-13. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.7/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependenciesn/a
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies -1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 3
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Qiaomu Cut Skill is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Qiaomu Cut Skill.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Qiaomu Cut Skill’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Qiaomu Cut Skill compares in Agent Skills

  1. #272 Phd Skills 48.1 +0.1
  2. #273 Opengap 48.0 ±0
  3. #274 Qiaomu Cut Skill 48.0 this agent
  4. #275 Supervisor Skills 48.0 ±0
  5. #276 Claude Code Java 47.9 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Qiaomu Cut Skill’s 48.0.

Where the 48.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

48.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Qiaomu Cut Skill Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.4 / 25
in line with avg 8.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.8 / 17
1.3 below avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.8 / 20
1.3 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.2 / 20
2.8 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 43 spots (#309 → #266)
2026-09-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.3pts (42.4 → 47.7)
2026-09-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 14pts (38 → 51)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
53.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#274

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-15 04:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
374
Forks
41
Last Push
2026-10-13
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
2?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼3
was #271

Analysis

Activity Inputs

53.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
15.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
6.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.5 / 20

Common questions about Qiaomu Cut Skill

Public trust evidence for Qiaomu Cut Skill is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Qiaomu Cut Skill publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Qiaomu Cut Skill. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Qiaomu Cut Skill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Qiaomu Cut Skill has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Qiaomu Cut Skill actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does Qiaomu Cut Skill use?
Qiaomu Cut Skill ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Qiaomu Cut Skill's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Qiaomu Cut Skill are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Qiaomu Cut Skill?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Qiaomu Cut Skill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Listed 2HVTrust 2Delisted 1Score 1
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 43 spots (#309 → #266)
2026-09-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.3pts (42.4 → 47.7)
2026-09-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 14pts (38 → 51)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#281 → #305)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#271 → #281)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.4pts (30.3 → 42.7)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #271
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#251 → #263)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#227 → #237)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#207 → #219)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#170 → #185)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#152 → #170)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#123 → #152)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#95 → #123)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#73 → #95)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#53 → #73)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #53

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 48.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/qiaomu-cut-skill.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/qiaomu-cut-skill)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/qiaomu-cut-skill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/qiaomu-cut-skill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON