Is Autoprompt Skill safe to use?

Autoprompt Skill has an HVTrust score of 48.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #280 of 384 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Autoprompt Skill?

Autoprompt Skill scores 48.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.2k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Autoprompt Skill

Repository

Autoprompt is a coding-agent skill that cuts failures by 45% on agentic coding tasks.

Agent Skills JavaScript Listed MIT

Is Autoprompt Skill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 13%

Last push 25d ago

Compare Autoprompt Skill

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Autoprompt Skill scores 48.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #280 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 13% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Autoprompt Skill could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.7 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0, Contributors 0 +9.0 → 57.1 C · #149 of 384
Sign every commit13% signed today +4.4 → 52.5 C · #223 of 384

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Autoprompt Skill and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

Source Partly signed

github.com/Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-04. 13% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
Review and release Mixed

OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.7/10 (scanned Oct 25, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection3
- Signed Releases0
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions10
- Pinned Dependencies8
All 18 Scorecard checks

Binary-Artifacts 4

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 6

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 8

SAST 8

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 10
Published packages None

No registry package. Autoprompt Skill is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

2026-09-11 OSSF Scorecard: 5.0/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

GitHub repository data
Package downloads (missing)
Supply-chain checks
Public actions (missing)
Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Autoprompt Skill’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Autoprompt Skill compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Autoprompt Skill’s 48.1.

Where the 48.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

48.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Autoprompt Skill Agent Skills average (384 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.5 / 25

1.6 below avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.5 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

11.5 / 20

2.5 below avg 14.0

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.4 / 20

1.6 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-10-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#253 → #242)

2026-10-10

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-10-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#211 → #247)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent View Agent Skills Report missing data

52.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#280

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-29

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.2k

Forks

Last Push

2026-10-04

25 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #279

Analysis

Activity Inputs

52.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

18.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

21.5 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

3.8 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.6 / 20

Common questions about Autoprompt Skill

Public trust evidence for Autoprompt Skill is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Autoprompt Skill publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Autoprompt Skill. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Autoprompt Skill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Autoprompt Skill has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Autoprompt Skill actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 25 days ago.

What license does Autoprompt Skill use?

Autoprompt Skill ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Autoprompt Skill's commits signed?

13% of the last 100 commits to Autoprompt Skill are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

medium confidence

Extensions

Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Autoprompt Skill's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based

Maintain Autoprompt Skill?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Autoprompt Skill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-10-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#253 → #242)

2026-10-10

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-10-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#211 → #247)

2026-10-10

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 3.2pts (52.4 → 49.2)

2026-10-10

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 7pts (64 → 57)

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#196 → #211)

2026-10-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#179 → #191)

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#157 → #175)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 81 spots (#77 → #158)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.6pts (45.8 → 54.4)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #77

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-11

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.0/10

2026-09-11

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank rose 206 spots (#341 → #135)

2026-09-11

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 32.9pts (22.8 → 55.7)

2026-09-09

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 6pts (66 → 72)

2026-09-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #335

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/autoprompt-skill.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/autoprompt-skill)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/autoprompt-skill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/autoprompt-skill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON

Autoprompt Skill

How Autoprompt Skill could raise its score

Chain of custody

Source Partly signed

Review and release Mixed

Published packages None

Changes to this chain

Evidence behind this score

Verify this score yourself

What this score doesn’t check

How Autoprompt Skill compares in Agent Skills

Where the 48.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

Quick Trust Read

Rank Trend

Activity & Reach

Analysis

Activity Inputs

Common questions about Autoprompt Skill

AI agent surface

Maintain Autoprompt Skill?

Reputation Timeline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

Other agents in Agent Skills