Ollama

Get up and running with Kimi-K2.6, GLM-5.1, MiniMax, DeepSeek, gpt-oss, Qwen, Gemma and other models.

LLM Gateways & Infra Go Grade B Listed MIT
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
65.0/100 · Grade B
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-18 · 1d ago
Recent change
Grade Changed +1

Is Ollama safe? Ollama scores 65.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #149 of 418 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.4/10; 90% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
65.0/100 · Grade B
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
19.5/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
11.3/25
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#127 → #139)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
98.3
Activity Score · out of 100
65.0
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#149
Global Rank · of 418
#6

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-19 08:02 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-19

Activity & Reach

Stars
176.4k
Forks
17.0k
Last Push
2026-07-18
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
79
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
66
Open Issues
2330
Rank Change
▼2
was #147

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

65.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.3 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.1 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.5 / 20
Adoption60% stars · 40% downloads, log-scaled
12.6 / 20

Activity Inputs

98.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
30 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
19.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 11, 2026
Signed Commits
90%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 9
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Ollama safe?

Ollama has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Ollama publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Ollama. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Ollama have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Ollama has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Ollama actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Ollama use?
Ollama ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Ollama's commits signed?
90% of the last 100 commits to Ollama are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in LLM Gateways & Infra

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • search
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Ollama's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: OpenAI, Postgres

Maintain Ollama?

HVTrust scores Ollama from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Rank 2Grade 2Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-07-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#127 → #139)
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: OpenAI, Postgres
2026-06-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.4/10
2026-06-04
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-06-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 102 spots (#180 → #78)
2026-06-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 30.3pts (36.9 → 67.2)
2026-06-02
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #181

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 65.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ollama.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ollama)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ollama"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ollama.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in LLM Gateways & Infra

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON