RegistryCompare › Instructor vs Ollama

Instructor vs Ollama

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Instructor and Ollama, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Instructor leads on trust — 66.3/100 (Grade B) vs 65.3/100 (Grade B), a 1.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Instructor567-labs/instructor Ollamaollama/ollama
HVTrust score 66.3 65.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade A B
Overall rank #143 #151
Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra #6 #7
GitHub stars 13.7k 177.8k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10 5.4 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 4.8M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.0 11.3
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.0 13.1
Maintenance / 20 17.0 19.8
Adoption / 20 18.8 12.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 11 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, … 2 — OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Instructor profile Ollama profile More LLM Gateways & Infra →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →