Registry › Compare › LLM Gateway vs Ollama

LLM Gateway vs Ollama

Ollama leads on trust: 67.6/100 (Grade B) against 63.8/100 (Grade C), a 3.8-point gap. LLM Gateway leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Ollama leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence.

C LLM Gateway 63.8

Route, manage, and analyze your LLM requests across multiple providers with a unified API interface.

theopenco/llmgateway · #562 overall · #7 LLM Gateways & Infra · coverage C (2/5)

Choose LLM Gateway if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+1.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 86%
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.4

B Ollama 67.6

Get up and running with Kimi, GLM, MiniMax, DeepSeek, gpt-oss, Qwen, Gemma and other models.

ollama/ollama · #434 overall · #5 LLM Gateways & Infra · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Ollama if adoption matters most.

+4.8Adoption: 185.7k GitHub stars against 1.7k
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

12.9

Safety / IntegrityLLM Gateway +1.8

11.1

13.9

TransparencyLLM Gateway +0.8

13.1

19.9

MaintenanceOllama +0.1

20.0

7.8

AdoptionOllama +4.8

12.6

-1.5

Runtime calibrationOllama +1.5

+0.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LLM Gateway and Ollama, two LLM Gateways & Infra projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	LLM Gatewaytheopenco/llmgateway	Ollamaollama/ollama
HVTrust score	63.8	67.6
Evidence grade	C	B
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#562	#434
Rank in LLM Gateways & Infra	#7	#5
GitHub stars	1.7k	185.7k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.3 / 10	5.4 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.9	11.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.9	13.1
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	7.8	12.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	2 — OpenAI, Postgres	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → LLM Gateway profile Ollama profile More LLM Gateways & Infra →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →