Mnemoverse Memory
Hosted persistent memory for AI agents over MCP. Tell it a recalled memory helped or misled, and it re-ranks what comes back next. Shared rooms for multi-agent work. One key or OAuth across Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code and ChatGPT. MIT, in the official MCP Registry.
Is Mnemoverse Memory safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Mnemoverse Memory
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Mnemoverse Memory scores 69.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #350 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.5/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Mnemoverse Memory compares in MCP Servers
- #207 Excalidraw Architect 69.5 +0.5
- #208 ServiceNow MCP Server 69.2 +0.2
- #209 Mnemoverse Memory 69.0 this agent
- #210 Streamdeck MCP 69.0 ±0
- #211 OpenClaw MCP Server 69.0 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Mnemoverse Memory’s 69.0.
Where the 69.0 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
69.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMnemoverse Memory MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
58.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Mnemoverse Memory
Does Mnemoverse Memory publish package provenance?
Does Mnemoverse Memory have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Mnemoverse Memory actively maintained?
What license does Mnemoverse Memory use?
Are Mnemoverse Memory's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Mnemoverse Memory's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Mnemoverse Memory?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Mnemoverse Memory from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mnemoverse-memory)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mnemoverse-memory"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mnemoverse-memory.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON