Imap MCP Server
A powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for IMAP email integration with Claude
Is Imap MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
Compare Imap MCP Server
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Imap MCP Server scores 81.8/100 (Grade A), ranked #122 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.0/10; 60% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Imap MCP Server compares in MCP Servers
- #54 UniFi Access MCP 82.1 +0.3
- #55 Exa MCP Server 82.1 +0.3
- #56 Imap MCP Server 81.8 this agent
- #57 AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server 81.8 ±0
- #58 Delimit — API Governance for AI Coding Assistants 81.8 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Imap MCP Server’s 81.8.
Where the 81.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
81.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceImap MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
63.0 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Imap MCP Server
Does Imap MCP Server publish package provenance?
Does Imap MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Imap MCP Server actively maintained?
What license does Imap MCP Server use?
Are Imap MCP Server's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Imap MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Imap MCP Server?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Imap MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/imap-mcp-server)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/imap-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/imap-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON